Online now
Online now

Hair or Bare?

↑ ↓
wildGurl​(sub female)
1 month ago • 07/05/2020 9:38 am
wildGurl​(sub female) • 07/05/2020 9:38 am
Sugaring is a form of waxing that works with a sugarpaste instead of wax and is better suited for sensitive skin. Google is also your friend 😉

Also it hurts less!
White Knight​(dom male){Vacant}
13 hours ago • 08/10/2020 10:43 pm
White Knight​(dom male){Vacant} • 08/10/2020 10:43 pm
Growing up when I did women had bras of iron, knickers that cut of your blood supply fingering in the pictures, and a totally natural bush ! So I’m easy either way! But what really turns me on is a beautiful red fuzz !!
10 hours ago • 08/11/2020 1:57 am
exploringmywildside • 08/11/2020 1:57 am
Bare....all the way!
SoMuchTrouble​(dom male)
9 hours ago • 08/11/2020 2:27 am
SoMuchTrouble​(dom male) • 08/11/2020 2:27 am
I don’t have a universal preference, as each woman’s hair is different, but I tend towards liking a decorative trim.
DesertLizard​(sub female)
5 hours ago • 08/11/2020 7:22 am
DesertLizard​(sub female) • 08/11/2020 7:22 am
I am curious–all those of you who said they prefer bare because they like the sensation of smooth skin, don't you run into issues with bumps and stubbles? In my experience, removing all the hair ≠ smooth skin. It's difficult to get a really close shave in the genital area, and hair also grows so fast that it is quite difficult to ensure there's no stubble at all. I remember my ex once shaved himself completely below the belt, but the tiny bit of remaining stubble was so abrasive when I tried to ride him that we had to stop 😵 And then of course there's bumps, razor burn, ingrown hairs, etc. that are the not so happy side effects of shaving. Waxing works a bit better because there's no remaining stubble and the hair that grows back is much softer. Unfortunately, I used to get red bumps and skin irritation from waxing, too. So conventional attempts to completely remove the hair would not result in smooth skin for me but instead in bumpy, irritated skin. (I have never tried sugaring, though, which one other member mentioned.) Having watched enough amateur porn, I know that there are plenty of other women for whom hair removal has similarly ugly results. Of course, there are also lucky people out there who can wax or regularly shave down there while their skin stays happy and healthy.

So are y'all just some of the lucky ones for whom hair removal does indeed result in smooth skin? And I wonder: suppose your partner's skin always ends up irritated, with lots of bumps and such when they try to remove the hair. In that case, would you still prefer them to do it, or would you prefer hair over bumpy red bare skin?

As for my own preferences, while I am not in principle opposed to completely removing all my pubic hair, seeing as my skin in that area punishes me mercilessly for shaving and waxing, I now just trim it short. However, the pubic hair towards the sides is gone anyways because, when I was younger, I had my bikini zone lasered (seeing as shaving and waxing wasn't an option for me and I was worried about being "ugly" down there...). So I have a kind of landing strip situation going on now. I also prefer my partner's pubic hair trimmed, although not completely removed. I find that, when it's trimmed, it doesn't get in the way during oral sex, and I also find it looks more masculine than a complete lack of hair. I am also a sucker for a nice "happy trail", and I like some chest hair. Not a big fan of a hairy back, though.