I was today messaged on FL following another member making an assumption and publically attacking me based on it. Despite repeated attempts on my part to defuse the situation and politely ask them to stop.
I later received a message from another user saying they were increasingly disagreeing with some of my most recent postings and had ''growing concerns" following recent comments I'd made.
The messsge read very much like a passive aggressive chastisement for me not nodding along and dancing to the contrmporary tune. The 'concerning' posts/comments in question were ones where I had become more vocal about Leather culture and how the modern culture was one of intolerance dressed as tolerance. Screaming about protecting marginalised groups while consistently shouting down and forcing out a marginalised group.
These posts of mine usually have a theme that the newer people often (but not always) lack the awareness to treat the subculture with the respect I feel it deserves. That ignorance then being used to demonise older models of practice which are then further used to justify bullying and pushing out an ever dwindling minority of traditionalists. The message ended with an unsubtle hint that I was being watched carefully.
Apparently refusing to agree that people of a more 'modern' view have a right to a double standards enabling them to bully people who have been around longer or take things more traditionally is ...wrong? If WE try to advocate or defend our views we're being ignorant of others and gatekeeping. If THEY do it its advocating for themselves and calling out bad actors/injudtice even for those with a demonstrable history of tolerance, community engagement and trying to be inclusive.
I imagine it is concerning to people who are now so used to not being challenged to not have automatic compliance. It concerns them others may not be on-board with mindless, self absorbed attitudes. I imagine it makes them feel threatened when their echo chamber is abruptly broken. If stating bullying of people whatever thrir viewpoint is enough to get a chewing out and veiled threat I'd say that's what is concerning.