TheVampTrav wrote:
I am not sure exactly where to start. I guess this is a very broad question regarding my capabilities to be a Daddy. I am a switch, and according to my test just a tad bit more on the submissive side, however i do have very dominating characteristics.
What characteristics are essential to Littles? How weak is to weak? What happens when your Daddy isn't strong when you need him to be?
These are my concerns. I feel like i can care about someone to no end...if the connection is there, i fewl that I give good advice and have a strong head on my shoulders, im determined, im passionate, im energetic and goofy. But im also dark, and self conscious, i have the tendency to doubt myself, and how well im doing with certain things especially if im not receiving communication.
These characteristics obviously are normal for most humans, but when i get in that dark place...its very difficult to get out of. Especially if my little is seeing it as a weakness, or unattractive.
I know this is not like an official question and more of a rambling but there is a lot swirling around in my head.
Hi Travis,
Actually, being aware of our shortcomings and worrying about how it will affect our lg's and then trying to figure out ways to mitigate this is something Daddies should do! I know you meant this as a desperate plea for help...but you're actually doing something very Daddy-like at this very moment.
Now...having said that. It doesn't necessarily mean being a Daddy is right for you. But I think the reality is way more hopeful than you may think.
I'm not trying to be rude, but I shall ignore most of your direct questions and get to the heart of what I believe the main questions and issues are (at the moment anyway--others may arise later).
I was talking to someone about this recently. Dynamic titles D/s, M/s, DD/lg, etc are just guidelines....they may share some broad characteristics together, but the truth is, there are as many kinds of dynamics as there are partners. No two dynamics are the same, even if classified under the same umbrella. Do not worry about whether there is some standard DDlg and some standard form of a Daddy and whether you measure up. Instead, worry about whether you can fulfill your needs, and those of your little, in a way that's beneficial to both of you--even if you create a dynamic structure that doesn't quite fit the mold of its classification.
It is less about can you be a Daddy to your little and more about do you want to be a Daddy to your little and does she want you to be her Daddy. You spoke about communication, and this would apply to you also. Did you communicate to her that you are interested in being her Daddy, however, you have concerns about certain shortcomings and whether these are a deal breaker to her. If she knows all this, and you explain what you think are some possible consequences and she still wants to enter a DD/lg-type dynamic with you. Then we're good bud'. Then starts the work of negotiating rules and protocols for the dynamic so each person knows what to expect and what is expected of them. And each person believes in good faith that they can offer what is expected (being aware that humans aren't perfect and we'll mess up sometimes, yadda yadda yadda, you know the drill).
Do you want her as a little, does she want you as a Daddy, despite both of your shortcomings? Figure that out first.