HEMI(dom male) |
2 years ago •
Oct 11, 2022
2 years ago •
Oct 11, 2022
HEMI(dom male) • Oct 11, 2022
CotrolYourHole wrote: I don’t think the spiritual commitment is silly of course, and if a ritual with prayer, music etc reminds people of that I’m not against it. I mean just the goverment-issued marriage licenses themselves are what I see as silly- because if the government has their own definitions of marriage now that don’t match the Bible. So what if the governmental definition of marriage doesn’t align with that of the Bible? That piece of paper affords the spouse various rights and financial benefits which they deserve and may well need. It’s not that we are necessarily condoning all aspects of the government’s definition. CotrolYourHole wrote: … & I see what you mean by posting Roman’s 1:26 but I think the “unnatural” part was that they were choosing not to have a husband & only desire women… You are reading into the verse what is not there. Anyway, that verse needs to be understood within passage context starting at verse 18. CotrolYourHole wrote: … there’s another verse in NT where it talks about women “leaving the natural use of the man”. I believe you are mistaken. See verse 27. CotrolYourHole wrote: So I feel like an argument can be made that those verses are talking about living a lesbian lifestyle, not two co-wives who happen to kiss or lick each other WHILE being dominated by their husbands(& being fruitful & multiplying in the process). Perhaps you might consider the traditional Christian understanding of that particular passage of Scripture. CotrolYourHole wrote: But I admit that my kinky desire to have two girls do stuff to each other while I manhandle their tied-up little selves might influence my interpretation🤭 I think so. |
|