2 months ago. January 9, 2025 at 1:55 AM
Over the years, I've listened to tons of bands, and had many favorites over the years. Though, after much thought, I'd probably have to admit, sometimes grudgingly, that my favorite band of all time would have to be Metallica.
Any band with as long a career, and as extensive a discography as Metallica will naturally create a wide variety of music over the years. So with that said, some of it clicks with me more than others. I've rated all eleven of their studio albums here, from my favorite to least favorite. The point of all of this is to inspire discussion. Most people know this band, some of you hate everything they've ever done, some love the albums I dislike, and vice versa. Let me know your thoughts! I've limited it to strictly full length studio albums though, not EP's or live albums. With that said:
1) "Master of Puppets." Their best in my opinion. Every song on this just kills, and the production is the right level of "Grit" to capture the aggression, passion and intensity while showing off their playing skills. This is the band at their peak.
2) "Kill Em All." I sometimes fluctuate between which of the first three are my top favorite. It's a fine line, because really all three together are close and it depends on my mood. At the time this was released, the band was the absolute cutting edge, next level stuff, and still underground. There was, as I recall, a cult, underground, dangerous, subversive energy around this album when it came to light- too gnarly to be played on the radio, and faster, heavier and darker than most metal at the time. Though it sounds tame compared to some of the underground metal that came out in the years following it. I love the youthful energy and passion here.
3) "Ride the Lightning." Again, cutting edge, re-invention of metal, a genre-defining and landmark record in every way. There were bands that played faster, bands that were more abrasive, and bands that might have had more musical chops, but at the time, nobody combined all three of these elements in the state-of-the-art way that Metallica did here. It has far more dynamic variation than the debut, with totally gnarly thrash tracks ("Fight Fire with Fire" and "Creeping Death"), dark, brooding heavy tracks ("For Whom the Bell Tolls") and powerful melodic tracks ("....Cthulu", and "Fade to Black.") The only reason I rated this lower than the other two is "Escape" is probably the weakest track on the first three albums, yet it is still a great track (go figure.) Interestingly, "Escape" seemed to set the template for a lot of their 90's material, only here, they still had the grit and intensity that similar tracks on, say, the "Load" sessions, do not have.
4) "Death Magnetic." This album is really varied, combining the thrashy, gnarly dynamics of their first three albums with the more mainstream sensibilities of the 90's stuff, and the labyrinthine riff-fests of "And Justice for All." Which is why I like it. Almost every song on here is a keeper; there are really only one or two weaker tracks. Had it come out after "Justice" I think it would have been much more well received. To me this was sort of a "Come back" album that rejuvenated their career in the 2000's; the one that all those fans who thought "Metallica sucked after And Justice For All" were waiting for.
5) "72 Seasons." Yes, the "new" album. I thought they did a good job with this one, with a lot of great, heavy tracks and plenty of great riffs throughout. "Lux Eternal" almost sounds like a "Kill Em All" track. However, it's not as consistent as "Death Magnetic" though; and as a result it kind of drags at times.
6) "And Justice for All." I was a bit disappointed with this one after "Master of Puppets," but it's not a bad album at all. Two main complaints here: It suffered drastically in the final mix- a result of Lars Ulrich being not entirely comfortable with then-new bass player Jason Newstead's contributions at the time. Also, too many songs are built on long-winded, mid-paced overly complex riff fests that drag on and get tiresome after a while. Case in point being the title track. It's good but... the previous three were better.
7) "Hardwired to Self Destruct." There are a few great songs on here, but there's also a lot of filler, and I've always thought that if the band had culled some of the filler and compiled the two-discs worth of material into a single disc comprising the better tracks, they would have been better off- and I might have rated this one higher. As it is, like "Justice" and "72 seasons," it kind of drags at times.
8) "Garage Inc." I wasn't gonna include this one because it's really just a "Covers" album and not their original music, but they did a good job with some of the tracks on here and it is occasionally a fun listen. "Turn the Page" however is overplayed. Its the Sabbath, Discharge, Misfits and Diamond Head covers that really carry this.
9) 1991 self titled, aka the "Black Album." This, to me, sounded like Metallica cashing in and selling out, compromising their sound. Granted, they deserved that brass ring so I don't begrudge them for making this. It always just sounded too polished and tame to me. It's a good hard rock/metal album though with plenty of iconic songs, and I can't really say it's a "Bad" album, just- it's not my favorite by them, by a long shot. 90's era Metallica was, in general, very conservative, musically speaking.
10) "Re-Load." Recorded the same time as "Load" but released a year later, this one has a slightly better collection of songs overall, in my opinion, with "Fuel" and "Memory Remains" being my personal favorites here. It's a good heavy rock album, fitting for the 90's when metal was pretty much passe anyway, but this was never really their strength.
11) "Load." Similar to "Re-Load," it's a basic rock n' roll record, decent for what it is, but very, very "vanilla." And, as you would guess based on my participation in a BDSM-themed blog, "Vanilla" is too bland for my tastes. So is this album.
12) "Saint Anger." I appreciate what they were going for here, but the results don't really add up. This sounds like it was just thrown together slap-dash and everything about it sounds half-assed: The songwriting, structuring, lyrics, lack of memorable solos, and the horribly botched production values. I like the idea of going back to their aggressive roots and letting this album basically be their version of venting out their frustration. But the songs just sounded under-developed, the lyrics made up on the spot, and the production- there is a difference between raw, unpolished production and horribly botched production- and this was just plain botched. In short, "Saint Anger" sounds like it was simply rushed- it needed more work.
13) "LuLu." I almost didn't include this one because it's really more of a Lou Reed album FEATURING Metallica, than a proper Metallica album. To summarize: I liked Lou Reed better with the Velvet Underground, and I like Metallica better without Lou Reed. This just sounds like a half-crazed and somewhat creepy old man rambling on about nonsense, backed by some of the most uninspired and bland Metallica riffing of their entire career. Overall it just didn't work for me.
I almost included "S&M" and the follow-up "S&M2" because, nothing would be more appropriate for this blog than S&M, right? Well, I didn't because, these are basically live albums and this post is already getting to the toolong/didnt read length as it is. Basically I thought it was an interesting concept but the results sounded a bit too slick and rather pretentious to me.
So there you have it! Comments welcome below, and if you hate everything related to Metallica, then that's fine too!