Solace wrote:
You asked a question, rhetorical or not, I answered.
Your response is less than accommodating to an alternate view point. It comes off as offended and hostile. I would argue that communication is entirely and solely for the exchange of ideas and information which does not appear to be occurring here.
My impression is that emotions and intent are being injected into words I've written. Thus to be clear, I write this in neutrality for expressions sake. Nothing I write is intended to physically or emotionally harm another, thus it would be impossible for my intent to be to paint you poorly. I'm very happy that you take such pride in your integrity and honesty. I take pride in mine as well, its a pleasure to meet another bird of familiar feather.
My original intent which has now been lost in a cacophony of words was to provide you an opportunity to reflect, privately if necessary, that your stance is TOO AGGRESSIVE. [Your opinion is just that, the way you addressed me personally is another story, not sure where you got the idea that it was okay]
That perhaps someone lying to hide a surprise birthday party (a white lie) is still an exceptional candidate as a Dominant. Though I do understand your submission is your gift to exceptional individuals, you might be shocked by the brevity of a list containing people who tell zero such falsities ever. Especially when it comes to birthday parties.
Some unintentional lies of your own:
1.) I have not stated that telling the truth requires one to be an asshole. (Sometimes it just unnecessarily hurts.)
2.) It was not an innuendo. (There was no intent)
3.) It is not difficult for me to believe that others do not feel the need to lie.
4.) I have not deliberately attempted to paint you in any light (monster, or weirdo).
5.) It does not defeat the purpose of communicating. (Some people communicate entirely to lie.)
6.) There is no hypothetical burr, m expressing an important alternate view point for people to use as how they understand it.
7.) I have not tried to portray you as unoptimistic person.
An example of how miscommunication can make a liar out of someone.
I have crappy writing skills, I have been told that, not everything is about you in the following words I am going to write. [That means I'm giving you information, not saying you implied, stated, or addressed it.
The last part of my post back to you was not about you either.
It was about me. Don't ask me a question if you don't want an answer. It has nothing to do with your post. Next, you know that the end of MY PERSONAL THOUGHTS ON THE FORUM QUESTION was not directed at you either. If you didn't know that, now you do.
*Your response is less than accommodating to an alternate view point. It comes off as offended and hostile.*
Your answer to my personal thoughts on lying was not given as an alternate view point. You started off telling me what I should do. So just can it on putting an alternate spin on it. My answer to your lecture post, was hostile. You did offend me.
I would argue that communication is entirely and solely for the exchange of ideas and information which does not appear to be occurring here.
You may argue anything you like. My comment about communication was in reference to instead of lying to your submissive communication [per your words, an exchange of ideas and information] may be a better route.]
*My impression is that emotions and intent are being injected into words I've written*
I want you to pay attention. You set out on a mission to put me into my place, and I recognized it from your very first sentence in your self-descibed 'alternative' outlook 1st comment back to me. So don't gaslight me with your above words. I read it with exactly the intention you wrote it.
*Thus to be clear, I write this in neutrality for expressions sake.*
SMH.
*My original intent which has now been lost in a cacophony of words was to provide you an opportunity to reflect, privately if necessary, that your stance is too aggressive.*
Your original intent was just what I described above. That's right I use a lot of words, just like you. Cacophony is yet but another backhanded insult. I may write like shit, but I have a large , huge, vocabulary.
Reflect [off of your 1st comment back to me] privately, privately or not, I was 100% right in what I said. You throwing your opinion on me, that's all it is. I know you believe you are Mr. DomlyDom, and that's okay, seen a million of you. This is exactly what I said it was to begin with remember and you denied it. I'm not some 20 year old, that you are going to shame or manipulate. You succeeded in making me angry for calling me a damn liar. And I will list the rest at the bottom. ,You are entitled to your opinion, what you are not entitled to, is to try and serve me a lesson. Do we understand each other?
MOVING ON [I see you moved the goal post]
*That perhaps someone lying to hide a surprise birthday party (a white lie) is still an exceptional candidate as a Dominant.* 👈
Why would I have to lie about a situation such as this? {Rhetoric}
Seems you did get a bee in your bonnet. Here is an example of your games you are playing.
👇
I never implied or wrote that all Dominants were bad!!!
MOVING ON [TO MY 7 LIES]
1. I have not stated that telling the truth requires one to be an asshole. (Sometimes it just unnecessarily hurts.)
You still don't get it. You implied it. I am hip to your manipulation of words. I'm not going back and copy/paste your comment bc you know what you wrote.
) It was not an innuendo. (There was no intent)
Inuenndo-
an allusive or oblique remark or hint, typically a suggestive or disparaging one:
My use of the word was spot on describing your attempts.
MOVING ON
It is not difficult for me to believe that others do not feel the need to lie.
Duck and weave. It is difficult for you to believe that I don't lie. You took something I wrote, and didn't like it, so you were all about teaching me a lesson, insulting what I wrote. My response to Dr.Wacko and your dislike of it is also mixed up in your attempt to cut me down to size. I pay attention to everything and every one. Deny, deny, deny, that will be a whopper of a lie.
MOVING ON
*4.) I have not deliberately attempted to paint you in any light (monster, or weirdo).*
Don't backtrack. Reread what I wrote above. You want be footloose with your words. By all means, deliberately. Did I accuse you of that or are you twisting something else to suit your agenda.[rhetorical]
You know exactly what you were doing in the 1st comment and your 2nd comment. I see right through you. Other than trying to cut me down to size [you don't have the capability, all you have succeeded in doing is proving that I was right in what I originally said about your attack]
Though you listed this under the heading of my lies, [I am deliberately leaving out the word unintentionally, since it's apparent that's what has to be done with you, it's a common theme these days with people]
*There is no hypothetical burr, m expressing an important alternate view point for people to use as how they understand it.*
This is 100% a lie. Now I know you are good with telling lies, but you should remove it from under the heading that's it's my lie.
If what you wrote above was true, then you wouldn't have addressed your backhanded insults, innuendos, a lesson to ME. Reads like more gaslighting.
I want to address something something else that you stick your foot in your mouth and made another assumption about.
Though I do understand your submission is your gift to exceptional individuals, you might be shocked by the brevity of a list containing people who tell zero such falsities ever.
This paragraph is fucking insulting . You made up everything up in it because that's the way your brain operates.
I have read every single thing you have written on this platforms.
There was plenty I could have critiques you on.
You took a simple sentence and turned it into some smashed up piece of snotty drivel from inside your head. DO YOU FEEL BETTER?
Because YOU WERE OFF FUCKING BY A CONTINENT.