DeepEmbrace(dom female)
|
1 year ago •
Jun 2, 2023
1 year ago •
Jun 2, 2023
Scammers:
I think any Dominant who has been in this long enough has been swindled. I know I have. Several other Dominants I know have. Noone wants to admit it because it can be embarrassing to admit that someone duped you. Hopefully, it happens once or maybe twice and then you don't ever let it happen again. Like people have said above, the scumbags who engage in swindling and milking money from other people are very, very, very good at it. You often won't know it happened to you until it is too late and they have disappeared.
Vetting:
Everyone has a different approach to vetting and this is due to the fact that everyone has a different level of risk tolerance. Some people run the equivalent of a CIA background check, others just want the basic info that would allow the police the best chance at catching whoever murdered them and dumped them in the Harbor, and others don't vet at all. It's a spectrum. I think some vetting approaches are waaaaaaaay too much, I think some vetting approaches are waaaaaaaay too little. If you are young, newer, and/or more naive no matter if you are new or young, then you probably need to do more extensive vetting because you don't know what to look for and you don't know the red flags yet and you don't know how to handle a situation yet; also, you probably need help vetting because again you don't know what you're even vetting for. If you are older, more experienced, and/or more worldly, then you probably can do less extensive vetting because you know what to look for, you know the red flags, and you know how to handle a situation. Yes, those are vast generalizations. Again, I think vetting is a spectrum and everyone is somewhere on it depending on their personal level of risk tolerance. And, arguably, I think having a safety team, safety call(s), and safety protocol(s) in place is much more important than vetting. But that is me. Everyone needs to figure out what works for them, what makes them feel safe and secure, and figure out their risk tolerance level.
In-person vs online:
We really need to get past this idea that people you meet in-person are safer than people you meet online. This is just not true. Noone can ever fully know what any other human being is thinking or capable of. No matter how you met them, where you met them, who knows them, who vouches for them, if someone wants to harm or kill you, then they can harm or kill you. It is dangerous to think "oh well I see Mark around at brunch and Tina knows him and says he is cool and I saw him at the convention and the workshop so he must be safe, right?" NO. Mark can be just as dangerous, rape-y, murder-y, and abusive as TarantinoTim from online could be. And, quite frankly, the people you should be worried about the most will probably never appear like you expect them to look. Serial killers and serial rapists, etc. don't rack up the counts they do by walking around in all black trench coats, driving a blood-covered white box van, with "i'll fuck you up and eat you" tatted across their neck. People are so busy looking for the wrong damn thing and thinking they can spot it that they cannot see the wolves in sheep's clothing right in front of them.
|