► Truemasterkai wrote:
It is generally a male attitude that showing emotion in relationships is a weakness that may lose you respect. Now, while being a dom and being male aren't mutually exclusive, the dom mindset is heavily inspired and informed by a male centric stance on relationship nuance. That guiding, in control figurehead. It is no surprise that such attitudes find their way here, then.
Now regardless of whether we think that is right or wrong, it could be said that all relationships of any kind are transactional. You have wants, needs and things that I might want. And if I do not have what you want in return, I won't get those things from you. And we decide what the currency of those transactions are. Emotional, financial, similarity in values and so forth.
The issue, in any relationship is when we claim to accept one kind of currency but yet operate as if we accept another. You might advertise that you want a person with x, y and z values most of all. But in actual practice, if they do not also have a or b, the rest do not matter. And in some cases, you'll be put off entirely.
That is where the disconnect happens. It is in the interests of doms to sometimes claim they are emotionally disconnected. Because the main currencies people want from doms look best and are least likely to be compromised if they aren't emotional. Stability, consistency, stern decisiveness etc. And yet, we acknowledge that emotional connection is mostly needed to some degree to reach the depths of the relationships we crave.
The solution, in short, is communication. As always. But further, we must allow each other that freedom to communicate without fear that it might compromise the currencies we agree on. It's going to be hard. And not everyone will always succeed. But we have to allow ourselves and each other to be humans first and then whatever position in a relationship second.
“Because the main currencies people want from doms look best and are least likely to be compromised if they aren't emotional.“
Is this statement actually true or just how you understand us s-types to be? I talk with roughly 20 s-types from this website on a regular basis. And most of us find that being able to be emotional to be a strength rather than a weakness. It’s the lack of emotions or lacking control/awareness of their own emotions that make me question the authenticity of an actual D type. Showing that they are looking for sex, kink, and/or control rather than wanting a dynamic. Just some warm body to feed their ego.
Personally I find it a weakness when a D type lacks emotions or lacks control of their emotions. How can someone try to guide me an emotional creature without emotions or control of theirs? It’s the same as trying to guide me financially without being control of one’s personal finances, guiding me on my career when they are not in control of their own, guide me sexually when they can’t control their own sexuality, and so on.