Extreme snip for brevity and focus:
dollMaker wrote:
The reason for mentioning all this is to counter the idea of the golden age, universal, monolithic oneness that some try to push. It never existed and never will. These threads often reveal, people are not open minded or respectful enough to allow the, your kinks not my kink and that's ok apply, just as your lifestyle choices are not my lifestyle choices and that's ok, and that includes collars, uses and meanings. I think its just a fact that people involved in bdsm are no more nice, or kind, open minded to each other than in the vanilla world.
The huge irony in all of this is, as I mentioned above, is that some people want to try and force an orthodoxy onto people in an alternative lifestyle which is the complete opposite of an orthodoxy. Maybe this is part of the human condition, kink or otherwise?
You're always very vocal and vehement as though your word is the last that should be heard (much less considered). In YOUR world there may have been no standard or defined protocols but that does not mean that *no* one had them or adhered to them. You seem to believe that if you didn't experience something first hand that it absolutely and positively never existed - anywhere on the face of the earth.
I've been extremely careful to have never appropriated the "Old Guard" label in my descriptions of my own experiences and the folks and organized groups I've kept company with for over a quarter of century. I've used the term "traditionalist" - for lack of a better one - to express what once WERE uniformly accepted styles of presentation and protocol. I actually admire those early post WWII gay leathermen for their bravery and dedication to their chosen lifestyle and wouldn't stoop so low as to claim it as my own.
On the other hand, I've repeatedly seen - on this forum and in these blogs - those who go out of their way to sneer at and belittle those of us who dare mention our own experiences over the decades and then dare to tell us we never did have the ideals and behaviors we can personally speak of knowing on a *first hand basis*. So many are intent on demanding inclusiveness while deliberately badgering those of us whose own lifestyle experiences differ from their own. So many marginalize *us*yet angrily demand that they be unquestionably acknowledged as above reproach. The act of acknowledging differences isn't the issue. It's the sniping and denying that those who've been around more than two decades really DID mingle with a far different group than most here are accustomed to.
I did no such thing, I was very careful to acknowledge the experiences of individuals in their locales, and be respectful about that, nor did I say they didn't exist there, but that is all it is their experiences in their locales it was not universal, or wide spread, in USA or elsewhere. There is no such thing as a traditional 'uniformly accepted styles of presentation and protocol' orthodoxy, never was. I will stand by that comment, and in regards to your comments about leathermen, also incorrect, there was no universal one way there either.