Fudbar(dom male){❤️❤️❤️}
|
6 years ago •
Jun 14, 2018
6 years ago •
Jun 14, 2018
I'm gonna flip into lecture mode here for a bit. Between the replies here and on NrsGoodBody's blog, there are some great thoughts about submission, but TPE is something pretty damned specific. While I agree that what Nurse describes does indeed resemble the 'ultimate' state of submission sought in TPE, the means and methods to TPE are rather different.
(section below taken from dominantguide.com, simply because they had the most concise definition I could reference in a hurry...)
The phrase Total Power Exchange was coined by Steven S. Davis in the newsgroup alt.sex.bondage during his debates with Jon Jacobs in the mid 1990′s.
In 1997 Davis gave this definition:
“A TPE (Total Power Exchange) relationship, sometimes described as an absolute lifestyle d&s relationship (that such relationships can actually be neither “total” or “absolute” is agreed; these are ideal states to be worked towards but which will not be achieved, which is why TPE may be better seen as a process or goal than as a state), is a relationship in which no impediment to the exercise of the owner’s power is accepted (some may, of course, exist, and what prudent owners do is to avoid direct collisions with these impediments, while working to overcome those that can be overcome (since the laws of gravity can’t be overcome, a sane owner isn’t going to ask a slave to fly (w/o appropriate equipment, of course), nor will a sensible owner try push a slave into things that are hard limits for hir (but the owner might push a slave up against what the slave thinks are hard limits but which she can in fact overcome)). Such things as safewords, contracts, negotiated limits, and anything else which recognizes / acknowledges / formalizes limits on the owner’s power are inimical to TPE.”
Both TPE and Jacob`s preferred term, Absolute Power Exchange, or APE are problematic terms for some people, including many who pursue exactly these types of D/s relationship, since the relationship is subject to the physical and the emotional limitations of the participants and therefore cannot genuinely be total nor absolute.
Most adherents to TPE or APE philosophies agree that the distinguishing feature is that the limitations are not chosen by the submissive or slave, and the word Enslavement (especially in Internal Enslavement) has become more popular as a term which focuses on the submissive’s, or slave’s, state of mind.
For those of you who skim, imma repeat the important part in caps;
"SUCH THINGS AS SAFEWORDS, CONTRACTS, NEGOTIATED LIMITS, AND ANYTHING ELSE WHICH RECOGNIZES/ACKNOWLEDGES/FORMALIZES LIMITS ON THE OWNER'S POWER ARE INIMICAL* TO TPE."
"...THE DISTINGUISHING FEATURE IS THAT THE LIMITATIONS ARE NOT CHOSEN BY THE SUBMISSIVE OR SLAVE..."
(*inimical is generally used to describe forces, concepts, or situations that are in some way harmful or hostile.)
To tie this back to Bunnie's question, if your Master wants to mold you, you will be molded. If your Master wants a doormat, you will be a doormat. I don't see that as weak, but...
TPE is fucking advanced level shit. It is absolutely not suitable for anyone as first BDSM experience, or something that one should 'explore' or 'dabble' in. Been in the BDSM scene for years and years? Explored all your kinks, pushed and broken some of your limits? Seen and have served under Doms, good and bad? Been hurt there? Learned from it? Still feel a burning desire to push it further? Found someone that you trust and know for years, who you've seen play? Seen them use and care for subs and know their methods there? Feel a deep connection with them like no other? Do they feel the same as you? Is that trust and bond strong and real?
Answer yes to all of those, and if both of you read the definition above and are still chomping at the bit.. then, and only then are you ready for TPE.
Can that happen? Absolutely. Read Nurse's blog, the feelings she has there say to me that her and Pianist might be getting to that point, and for them TPE might work...
The problem with TPE is that to an inexperienced or insecure Dom, it's an appealing 'shortcut' to actually earning submission and developing that deep bond. The 'offer' DammitJanet quoted is a perfect example. (I've left the spelling errors and CAPS intact. That alone should speak to the control, attention to detail, and stability of the one making the offer...)
"How much control do you want to give up?
How basic do we go back to.
ABsolutes! "
Great. He's having to explain TPE and make an offer. If you have to do this for a sub, that sub isn't ready for TPE. Red Flag.
"I DO NOTshare you with any Dom nor can you switch. "
Nothing to do with TPE, all about an insecure mono Dom. Red Flag.
"You follow my iinstructions, but i want you to ask respectful questions as we go. "
Fair enough, but it's deceptive and hides the true nature of TPE. See full definition above. Red flag.
"My LT Goal is for MY sub to fall completly in love with me. To the point that I am her life.."
Red flag. Big one. Run. This is someone that hasn't the slightest clue about how love and devotion works, and thinks TPE will help. What he claims is a 'goal' should actually be the bare minimum of trust and bond between the two partners before TPE is even discussed.
I'm the last person on earth to advocate for orthodoxy in BDSM, and I certainly have issues with those that preach OG/Lifestyle or anything else as the 'one true way'... but I still have respect for those systems, their traditions and the significance of that.
Want to find a new way to explore submission, driven by self exploration? Great. Don't call it TPE. It blurs the lines on a very specific, advanced and dangerous kink.
Want to express your bond and devotion and publicly demonstrate a bond? Great. Don't call that collaring. Collaring is marriage level shit.
I try to speak personally. As I said, this ain't that, it's more of a lecture, and will get some backs up. I get that.
/end lecture.
|