Online now
Online now

The Ramblings of Dickhead Idealist

I'd like to see some a lot of the old ways return. When a slave dedicated themselves to their Master, and a sub to her Dom, and a Top took care of their bottems even when it didn't mean getting laid.... A lot of those old fashioned ideas will be found here.
2 years ago. February 26, 2022 at 1:06 PM

Why do we put children as a limit? It seems rather strange to me. I've got a better idea... how about if children. AREN'T a limit for you, just go ahead and stick that at the top of your profile. It'll save us all a lot of time and energy.... and the polices too.

 

Children should not be a limit. Children should not even be part of the conversation. I'm all for YKINMK but kids are not a kink. Not only would doing anything with kids be objectively morally wrong, it's also a big ole fat FELONY. 

 

Why am I bitching about this? Why do I care? 

 

I care because there is a dangerous leap of logic that leads to a very dark place that starts with this simple harmless action. It's the same leap that means that I, as a poly person, cannot have a P in the alphabet mafia. Pedophiles. 

 

Pedophile have long looked for a place to normalize themselves in society. They have turned to rebranding, calling themselves MAP (minor attracted persons), or piggybacking, as they attempted to do with the alphabet mafia. The last thing we need as a lifestyle is for them to decide to try to join us as we normalize our way of life. 

 

My suggested edit?

 

"Things or persons who cannot consent." This delivers the same message but in a clearer way. Consent is key. Children cannot consent because they can never be properly informed. Their brains are not developed enough to be able to conceptualize the ideas we would need them to understand in order to consent. At the same time this covers drunk/high people, animals, mentally handicap people who are below the ability to think like an adult, and so many more. 

 

We have to think about the little things. Our words and actions guide those arround us. Little things grow into big things and big things change the game. 

 

*steps off my soap box* 

 

Thank you for listening. 

CSI - This is a much better way to put it
2 years ago
slaveMikayla​(sub female){MstrJ } - Well, not to detract from your very valid point, I need to clue you in on something. Just fyi it means HAVING CHILDREN. There is a thing called breeding fetish. For some people that is a limit. For others, dealing with people who currently have children or want children is a limit, because not all humans want to procreate or deal with the myriad issues related to dealing with working around kids.


So no, "children" as a limit =/= no paedophilia.... Hopefully this adds some clarity.
2 years ago
Bunnie - And not to detract from your very valid point ;) lol, observing that it’s often listed with beastiality, my thoughts are that most often than not it is meant in the context of paedophilia.
2 years ago
slaveMikayla​(sub female){MstrJ } - That is because people just copy from others. If you stop to ask them that they mean, it becomes more clear. Ask the same people what they mean by "blood" and they haven't considered if they mean cutting or ingestion or whatnot. People who DO know and HAVE considered I've never had the answer you are saying it is usually covered under "illegal."
2 years ago
DrJokerTearMiser​(sadist male) - I have to disagree with you and agree with bunnie. Breeding is breeding. Children are children. So for the ones that you are right about I suggest they change their limit to breeding as that is what their limit actually is.
2 years ago
Bunnie - *standing ovation*
2 years ago

You must be registered and signed in to comment


Register Sign in