Online now
Online now

Longer-Term D/s Considerations

Things unseen often affect relationships. This is a (perhaps infrequent) chance to look at some of them through the lens of a decade or more of online experiences with a variety of submissive partners.
5 years ago. July 31, 2018 at 6:07 PM

I've recently had my eyes opened by a most persecptive sub on the subject of 'ownership'.   I suspect most of us Doms  like "having" our subs.....But is 'having' the same as 'owning'?  And what exactly does 'owning a sub' mean?

 

There is a subset of the D/s community that believes in drawing up and signing contracts, which can be elaborate and official looking, even if they have no legal standing at all.  I suppose there is comfort for both parties in such an effort, but that is not my world.

 

Nor does "owned" mean 'exclusive',  as many here are married and not to their D/s partners.  And Doms are notorious for wandering eyes, or having more than one sub at a time.  Subs have also been known to keep an eye out for other experiences, too.  So I have little confidence that "owned"  often means 'permanent' or 'exclusive', though in some cases that is the case.

 

So the questiona rises,  What do we mean by the profile tags of  "taken" or "owned"  or "protected"?   Notice I did not include "Collared", since most commonly 'being collared'is in connection with a scene.  The Dom and the sub attach the sub's collar to tell both that they are in scene, that the sub will obey the Sir, within their agreed limits, until the scene ends.  So collaring is a scene specific label.  Most subs do not wear clearly submissive collars of steel or leather, with D-rings or studs or whatever, out to their day jobs.  They are not 'in scene'.

 

But it all gets fuzzier with this word "owned".   The tutorial I have been led into (for my own good, I think)  has led me to a  clearer concept, at least clearer for me.  

 

"Owned" simply means "Cherished".  For me is is not about possession,  it is an endearment.

 

I'd be delighted to hear your differing takes on this  common, but perhaps ill-defined concept.

Bunnie - In relation to this site, “owned” kind of seems to be the next stepping stone after “claimed” or “taken.” It is slightly more “official.”
Offline, owned takes on a very different meaning. One example is that there is a dynamic of M/s that is not kink related... it is a Master (TPE) led relationship... and many do not believe in the concept of “collaring” (a collar around the neck/any type of jewellery signifying a “collar”). Rather they become Owners of their property, and may choose to use a form of branding instead.
So, to clarify... although there is a possibility to find the people that have that belief system here, the way that I’ve commonly seen “owned” (and used it myself here) used here, is not for the reasons just stated.
“claimed,” “taken” and “owned” here, seems much more based around a way of simply letting others know that you’re with someone who identifies as a Dom.
5 years ago
Redtailedkitty - I agree with that. They seem to be terms that go up in seriousness of the relationship. For me Collared is the top of that list. You can’t get more serious than that. I’ve seen it in in-person dynamics as well. Not just ina virtual environment. :)
5 years ago
Redtailedkitty - I, respectfully, disagree wholeheartedly that being collared is scene specific. I wear a day collar 24/7. It means, to me, and great many other D/s couples I know, that it is permanent. It doesn’t not get taken off, except for medicial procedures. It is symbolic like a wedding ring and means the same for those of us that are serious about the lifestyle and live it 24/7. For me, being collared does mean I am owned by my Sir. I am his and always will be. Again, it symbolizes permanence. Sure, I wear a play collar as well and it is a way of grounding both our headspaces and something to attach things too.

I do agree that it does not necessarily mean exclusive for the reasons you listed above. It does usually imply that it is a collared relationship is a primary relationship. I cannot have relations with another without Sir’s implicit consent. Whether or not he takes on another sub is dynamic specific. I think it is more common in M/s dynamics. To say Doms (or subs) have roving eyes is a generalization. I know as many monogamous D/s dynamics than I do poly. But both exist. I think in a D/s it would more need to be in agreement with both parties whereas in an M/s the slave has less, if any say in it and is more likely to occur in that dynamic. Just my opinion.
5 years ago
CapnRick​(dom male) - Thanks, Bunny...We seem to be somewhere on the same page in our thinking ,then....Appreciate your comment!
5 years ago
CapnRick​(dom male) - Good reminder, RTK, that things might be different in 24/7 relationships...Since I've never experienced that level of commitment, I tend to overlook the differences, and your perspective is welcome.
5 years ago

You must be registered and signed in to comment


Register Sign in