Logical Phallus

This will be my first full length entry for my logical blog so I might as well piss some people off. Im sorry to inform you that the subject will be on ghosts. This will call into question the afterlife and possibly religion. As an aspiring science and math major I have noticed a large disparity in the notion of ghost sightings. The current human population is around 6 billion people, while the number of the people who have died is significantly larger, so much so that it is not a multiple but a factor. This would infer that if ghosts were an actual occurance and the convergence percentage was at 100% then the living population would be swimming in a sea of ghosts so thick it would be difficult to even see were they all visible. Let's suppose they aren't visible. The supposed cooling effect that ghost hunters use as proof for ghost exsitance would, in the case of 100% ghost population, freeze the earth solid. This doesn't even cover the sugestion that ghosts move objects, make noise, and possess live bodies. A cocophony of whispers and wails, measurable magnitudes of shifting furniture, and a genocide level of human loss through possession. Even at only 1% of all dead people existing as ghosts the population would exceed the current population of live humans by a large margin. I think that far more 1% of the dead would be considered to have died angry, unfulfilled, or through a violent end. Being that no concrete scientific has been found that supports ghosts and we aren't currently drowning in the chaos of melevolent beings that, by definition ghosts want you to know that they are the culprits, I conclude that it is far more likely they do not exist than that they do. If they were real I would actually be slightly bitter that I had not had the opportunity to encounter an apparition that I could study.