This particular blog is inspired by a blog i read today by AngelBunny titled: "Lasso of Truth" i thought it was a wonderful, insightful and worthwhile read, so thank you to her for writing it.
To me, "life" or "living" is connection and relationship. i believe a universal thread that binds us all together is the need/desire for love. To me, love has a wonderful, fluffy, mysterious side to it, but that it also has a practical side (more on that later). i see the need/desire for love (in part) as the need/desire to be seen/heard, acknowledged and affirmed, and i think it's something everyone needs/desires. i see the practice of love (in part) as the practice of looking, listening, seeing, hearing, acknowledging and affirming another (valuing them?).
To me, "life/living" (or a big part of it) is "connection." Many (most?) are here looking for it in some form, eh? i believe the 'best' connections happen mixed with (because of?) "love." i think love helps both open and sustain connection. i also think compatibility (especially of kinks) is as important as love (which i know flies in the face of a lot of cultural notions... topic for a different blog).
i see "reflection" as a beautifully layered word, i can imagine it literally, like looking in a mirror and seeing our self. i think we can self reflect, and i think we can 'see' our self reflected in relationship/s by/with others. i think "seeing" what is there, who and what we are, is important because that's what experiences love, connects and bonds to others. That, the more we see, the greater the potential for love, connection and bonding. Or, put another way, unseen is being/knowing lonely, unloved, un-connected, un-bonded.
i see self reflection as a vital component. We need to know ourselves if we are going to reveal ourselves, strip, expose something another wants/needs. But if all we have is self reflection, i think it's easy to get a narrow and/or distorted 'reflection.' i think relationship can be like a mirror that further aids self discovery, but no ones 'mirror' is flawless, so the reflection we see of ourselves in others isn't perfect either. Enter another layer of "love."
i left (my) religion 14 years ago, 'it' did a lot of damage, but i got good stuff from it too, stuff i kept/keep. One thing i keep is parts of a discussion of "love" in the bible. In the King James translation there's a statement that: "we see through a glass darkly," i absolutely love that phrase/analogy, and for me it has layered meaning. During the time period of King James, those who had mirrors, used dark, rippled glass, as mirrors. One meaning i see in "see through a glass darkly" is the reflection one sees of ones self is correspondingly "dark and rippled." Another "layer" for me is that we see others "through a glass darkly." I.e, we don't see them wholly, clearly, either.
The discussion goes on to say: "in many things we all stumble... we know and see in part," then brings in "love," and as i read it, states an argument for love is because "we know and see in part... see through a glass darkly." As i see it, it gives some attributes of love? In a more modern translation (New International Version): "4 Love is patient, love is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not proud. 5 It does not dishonor others, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs. 6 Love ... rejoices with the truth. 7 It always protects, always trusts, always hopes, always perseveres."
To me, that's just a sort of break down of graciousness born out of the understanding, grasping, that we all "see through a glass darkly." That, "hey, i'm hurt or pissed because you________. But then the practice of love gives space for flaws, or can bridge that space? i see "love" as a principle to try and live by, a practice... not a place we ever reach permanently, but at times? A standard that can re-center a relationship, as well as an important ongoing ingredient. i think"love" is an ingredient that makes vulnerability, openness, honesty, more possible, thus helping enable connection and bonding. To me, it helps to see some of the practical side of love, it's not all ethereal and foggy.
A quick re-interjection here: i think a lot of religions/religious, and others, have turned "love" into a weapon of sorts, into a passive aggressive act using the ideal to manipulate and control... usually one sided. i think it only works in relationship if both are truly dedicated to its practice individually, not because they are chided or guilted into it. i think a lot of religions deteriorate into that because they rely on magic instead of compatibility (yeah, i know, that's a topic on its own for me, and this blog is already long and complex).