Online now
Online now

blah, blah, blog

Thanks to Ingénue{Círdan} there is a recent spate of blogs in THE CAGE, written by males... mostly "Dom males." my first thought is they are not so much suddenly sold on the idea of blogging as they can't resist their instinctual (natural?) urge to rise... to a challenge? Time may tell.

i get to proudly declare that with >360 forum entries (many lengthy), i'm not among the non-writers in the cage, but this is my first blog. Apparently to some, it's 'different for girls'? Pause for musical interjection: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nNzzK1dUtCI

As a gay sub i have often wondered if my love of, and propensity for, writing has something to do with my wiring? Is it because i'm gay and it's a result or expression of my feminine side? But then, that stereotype unravels for me because it turns out i am just as frustrated as many women are with their straight guys, by all the gay guys who don't 'blog' (read: "open up and talk about their thoughts and feelings").

Ever that analyst, i have come up with all sorts of reasons for that.

1. Blame the patriarchy. Lol, no really. Cliche aside, i think there is some truth to putting at least partial blame on engrained (patriarchal) cultural conditioning that has trained boys from birth that they are different when it comes to stuff like having feelings and expressing thought and feeling. An irony is how much of that conditioning comes from women (mothers, aunts, teachers) who have internalized patriarchy also conditioned in. i am convinced that a lot of internalized patriarchal influence still flies under the radar, even in a more enlightened era.

2. Biology? Neuropsychiatrist and writer Louann Brizendine has authored two books that look at our biological/brain wiring: "The Female Brain" and "The Male Brain." On page six of her book "The Female Brain" she notes: "Under a microscope or an fMRI, the differences between male and female brains are revealed ot be complex and widespread. It the brain enters for language and hearing, for example, women have 11 percent more neurons than men. The principal hub fo both emotion and memory formation-the hippocampus-is also larger in the female brain, as is the brain circuitry for language and observing emotions in others. This means that women are, on average, better at expressing emotions and remembering details of emotional events. Men, by contrast, have two and a half times the brain space devoted to sexual drive as well as larger brain centers for action and aggression." Note: as a scientist, i think Dr Brizendine may overreach a bit with her conclusions, but i think she raises points for further query? She also promises to write a book on "The Gay Brain," which is also different in its physiology.

3. Given the prior two points, i think most men may be handicapped ( both by nature and nurture) when it comes to emotional communication? Which is not to say guys cannot do it. Check out the percentage of authors and screen writers who are men? Which is not to excuse the crime of sexism that has limited female contributions, but to note that it is entirely possible for men to learn how to know and express things like emotion. It may take work, but i think men can learn how to communicate things like emotion, their inner self, even if it doesn't come as naturally to do so.

i was an avid reader as kid. i sensed i was different from most boys and learned how to hide very early on (five or six years old retrospectively). It took till i was about 14 to bury myself for survival. i grew up in a conservative religious household, just to add to the fun and help bury more parts of me. But even as a kid i can remember how frustrated i'd become with my dad, trying to get him to open up and share himself. We didn't do a lot of talking or sharing in our family, so books became my best friends.

Later on in life, i realized that i had developed people reading skills in order to satisfy my need for communication and connection in a family that did not use words. One thing i learned was how a side effect to being in an environment where words were used minimally to communicate was the notion and expectation that others were people readers too. Turns out that people reading can greatly enhance/supplement communication, but on its own (without words), is horribly inadequate. As an aside, i wonder how many guys are stuck in a place where they assume (unconsciously) that people/mind reading is an adequate thing? That people know more about them than they have actually revealed?

i began learning how to communicate when i married. Initially i would get very frustrated with my wife, assuming she knew how i thought or felt about a thing, even though i had not adequately communicated. i'd actually get angry with her, assuming she was toying with me. The funny thing is, i quickly surpassed her when it came to communication her once i realized i had to use words.

Turned out i was less afraid of being open and vulnerable, and the tables turned. With me it was ignorance that kept me from communicating, with her it was fearful hiding. So, a word of warning to the self protective out there looking for communicating mates, be careful what you ask for.
2 years ago. October 19, 2021 at 3:53 PM

Have thought of this a lot and think my line of thinking would probably resonate with many people who have these as part of their identity. For instance, when i was married (to a woman), even though i was gay and that was the most obvious elephant in the room, i came to understand that we were also both bottom and sub natures. So, our chemistry sucked all around (and not in a good way).

i always include both descriptors in profiles and explanations though, because for me, they are different and their order of importance is different too. i have found that that is not unique to me or people on my side of the slash, but i have also found it can be important distinction for Top/Dom people to know about and understand as well. 

When i first started exploring D/s culture, i ran into a lot of people identifying as both Dom and sub who had that black or white definition of those predilections that lots of us here in this community have come to relegate to immaturity or ignorance. But i think we all have bias and a natural tendency to be ethnocentric, even with D/s stuff, so it's prolly good to always be aware that we may not be as aware as we think we are.

Sorry, that was a long prelude.

i am "bottom/sub," with the "bottom" part in front (which sounds counter intuitive as i read it). What i mean is, my sub nature follows my bottom nature, and i know it's opposite for others. For me, the more a Top knows about how to 'penetrate' me, the more skilled and connected He is to that process, the more sub i become with Him. And really, "connected" should proceed "skilled." For me, presence and awareness (that leads to connected to my way of thinking), is far more important than "skill."  "Penetration" has myriad forms and meaning to me, not just talking about physical. To me, and i think really this is a part of most bottom nature, the best and most powerful penetration is holistic, it involves the whole person, not just the physical. If my observation is correct, i think the opposite is also true, i.e., the most powerful (and pleasurable?) penetration for a Top is also holistic?  

Re the order and connection of bottom/sub though... (and this reads way too clinical to me, it isn't, so sorry for 'sounding' that way), the most powerful and effective influencing/handling for me happens when a Top connects and penetrates me skillfully and thoroughly. For me, it's sort of like an avalanche when it happens, or one door opens the other. The more my bottom nature is accessed and handled, the more submissive i become.  i have found that things i never would have 'submitted" too initially, are things i am opened to (not open to, opened to), when well 'penetrated' first. 


You must be registered and signed in to comment


Register Sign in