Online now
Online now

blah, blah, blog

Thanks to Ingénue{Círdan} there is a recent spate of blogs in THE CAGE, written by males... mostly "Dom males." my first thought is they are not so much suddenly sold on the idea of blogging as they can't resist their instinctual (natural?) urge to rise... to a challenge? Time may tell.

i get to proudly declare that with >360 forum entries (many lengthy), i'm not among the non-writers in the cage, but this is my first blog. Apparently to some, it's 'different for girls'? Pause for musical interjection: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nNzzK1dUtCI

As a gay sub i have often wondered if my love of, and propensity for, writing has something to do with my wiring? Is it because i'm gay and it's a result or expression of my feminine side? But then, that stereotype unravels for me because it turns out i am just as frustrated as many women are with their straight guys, by all the gay guys who don't 'blog' (read: "open up and talk about their thoughts and feelings").

Ever that analyst, i have come up with all sorts of reasons for that.

1. Blame the patriarchy. Lol, no really. Cliche aside, i think there is some truth to putting at least partial blame on engrained (patriarchal) cultural conditioning that has trained boys from birth that they are different when it comes to stuff like having feelings and expressing thought and feeling. An irony is how much of that conditioning comes from women (mothers, aunts, teachers) who have internalized patriarchy also conditioned in. i am convinced that a lot of internalized patriarchal influence still flies under the radar, even in a more enlightened era.

2. Biology? Neuropsychiatrist and writer Louann Brizendine has authored two books that look at our biological/brain wiring: "The Female Brain" and "The Male Brain." On page six of her book "The Female Brain" she notes: "Under a microscope or an fMRI, the differences between male and female brains are revealed ot be complex and widespread. It the brain enters for language and hearing, for example, women have 11 percent more neurons than men. The principal hub fo both emotion and memory formation-the hippocampus-is also larger in the female brain, as is the brain circuitry for language and observing emotions in others. This means that women are, on average, better at expressing emotions and remembering details of emotional events. Men, by contrast, have two and a half times the brain space devoted to sexual drive as well as larger brain centers for action and aggression." Note: as a scientist, i think Dr Brizendine may overreach a bit with her conclusions, but i think she raises points for further query? She also promises to write a book on "The Gay Brain," which is also different in its physiology.

3. Given the prior two points, i think most men may be handicapped ( both by nature and nurture) when it comes to emotional communication? Which is not to say guys cannot do it. Check out the percentage of authors and screen writers who are men? Which is not to excuse the crime of sexism that has limited female contributions, but to note that it is entirely possible for men to learn how to know and express things like emotion. It may take work, but i think men can learn how to communicate things like emotion, their inner self, even if it doesn't come as naturally to do so.

i was an avid reader as kid. i sensed i was different from most boys and learned how to hide very early on (five or six years old retrospectively). It took till i was about 14 to bury myself for survival. i grew up in a conservative religious household, just to add to the fun and help bury more parts of me. But even as a kid i can remember how frustrated i'd become with my dad, trying to get him to open up and share himself. We didn't do a lot of talking or sharing in our family, so books became my best friends.

Later on in life, i realized that i had developed people reading skills in order to satisfy my need for communication and connection in a family that did not use words. One thing i learned was how a side effect to being in an environment where words were used minimally to communicate was the notion and expectation that others were people readers too. Turns out that people reading can greatly enhance/supplement communication, but on its own (without words), is horribly inadequate. As an aside, i wonder how many guys are stuck in a place where they assume (unconsciously) that people/mind reading is an adequate thing? That people know more about them than they have actually revealed?

i began learning how to communicate when i married. Initially i would get very frustrated with my wife, assuming she knew how i thought or felt about a thing, even though i had not adequately communicated. i'd actually get angry with her, assuming she was toying with me. The funny thing is, i quickly surpassed her when it came to communication her once i realized i had to use words.

Turned out i was less afraid of being open and vulnerable, and the tables turned. With me it was ignorance that kept me from communicating, with her it was fearful hiding. So, a word of warning to the self protective out there looking for communicating mates, be careful what you ask for.
2 years ago. January 28, 2022 at 8:46 PM

For lack of a better title?  This blog post is really bits and pieces, but i've no doubt come of those bits and pieces will resonate with some with similar bent or circumstance, so onward with the share.

i'm in a relationship, so far only online, with a person who identifies as: Dom, Daddy, Sir, Master, Beau... probably left some out. As a gay, total bottom, i have a sub side, and some boy and girl (belle to corresponding "Beau"?) as well.   That's not all of Him or me, but enough to draw a picture here. 

The "gay, total bottom" parts of me are different in that i am that way regardless of anyone else. The sub part of me is semi dependent on my Mate in order present, and the boy and girl parts are totally dependent on my Mate in order to present. 

Recently i've been making Him some sexy pics and vids of stuff He's said He likes. He'd have me doing this daily, but i do it on occasion because otherwise it gets out of balance (to me?) and i feel more like a porn performer than His boy.  For me, 'it's' mostly about connection and bonding, so i send text along with my pics or vids explaining what i am feeling and thinking. If i get a sense He is just looking at the visuals, it has the effect of shutting me down. If He shares His feelings and thoughts, it fuels further endeavors on my part. i'm not naturally inclined to do pics or vids, so it's been a discovery for me to see i can enjoy and connect this way.

But for Him to task me with making them, without getting the connection factors i need? Not going to happen. Not because i am feeling rebellious, but because to me, it stops being relationship if both of us is not getting what we love/want/need. And my rule of thumb in sexual/kink relationship is to find mutual kinks that keep our the exchanges symbiotic.  

i sent a couple of pics today that i was pretty confident would, eh, get a rise out of Him. He replied: "OH JESUS! I CAN'T TAKE IT.  HAVE TO LOOK AWAY AND FOCUS ON WORK. YOU ARE AN EVIL, SEDUCTIVE SIREN, YOU ARE!"   

i replied: "lol, i'm not an evil siren, i really am not. i'm a real and sincere boy with a pussy who loves, wants and needs You and am so truly happy when You are happy with me." 

(Hope this is not too much openness on my part for some, but openness and vulnerability are big part of this blog post, so, keeping it real demonstratively).

There's so many layers i can see to discuss here, but i don't want this to be a mile long blog. This post is about "power exchange." 

Lots of great discussions are had in The Cage about who wields the power and control in a D/s dynamic. i think a lot of people on my side of the slash want the Person on the other side to wield the power and control. i do, and maybe the above shared exchange is illustrative of that to some?  i obviously affected desire in Him, but i want who and how i am to have that effect, not a manipulative act or expression of power. i did not do what i did on my own, i did it because He likes and wanted it. my nurture came/comes from His real thrill.

But, if He just looks at the pics and doesn't respond to the text. If He doesn't tell me how He feels and thinks. If we do not connect and bond as a result, the activity loses value... i think, for the relationship. i think He may get momentary pleasure, but nothing of lasting value. 

i'm looking at where the power exchange is in this. i see His power in eliciting desire in me to please Him and do something i would not otherwise do, but it does not come without an expectation of return on my investment. And that sounds way more clinical than it is. i truly enjoy and get excited by His happiness with me. But i have to be able to connect us, not just the act making Him happy, but me. So, to me, He really does have the power to elicit desired response in me, or not. But it seems to come down to whether or not He wants to make the 'investment' as well? 

BTW, this is not meant to be a public airing of my personal stuff to elicit advice. This is not intended to be a post where one is right or wrong or there is a good or bad side. i'm not feeling any of that.  Just looking at the dynamic with a real life example. 

 

Curiousmind​(sub female){Owned} - Thank you for expressing the male’s perspective on submission. Most of the blogs here are the expression of submission from female’s perspective. What you are saying resonates with me and the way I view the essence of power exchange relationships.
2 years ago
tallslenderguy​(other male) - Thank you Curiousmind. i find a lot of cross over with women subs, so i think there may be things similar to being sub? And that's probably an over simplification. When i was married and trying not to be gay, i remember things that happened between me and my wife where she'd want something and i'd think: "i want that too." She'd look at me quizzically saying: "you're the man, you're supposed to be _____________. i could relate to her on some things.
2 years ago
Curiousmind​(sub female){Owned} - I guess it must be a good feeling to finally be true to yourself!
2 years ago
A Cloud​(sub female){Owned} - Yay! Nice to see you here in Bloglandia. I really love your open expression; it reassures me in my own attempts.
2 years ago
tallslenderguy​(other male) - Thanks Betty. i have tried to practice openness for a long time. i feel if i want to connect as completely as one can, there's a risk of openness to be taken. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't. But when it works, the connection can be so intense and amazing, i end up trying it again. i'm not sure it's smart, but it is addictive lol.
2 years ago
A Cloud​(sub female){Owned} - I think I understand. Once you get a taste, there is no going back and the risk is better than the alternative. 🧡
2 years ago

You must be registered and signed in to comment


Register Sign in