Erick(sub male) |
4 years ago •
Feb 22, 2020
4 years ago •
Feb 22, 2020
Erick(sub male) • Feb 22, 2020
@SimplyLaura--
Just because you are not using my name, your remarks are no less ad hominum. I am not "willfully contrarian." As Harry Truman said, "I don't give 'em hell. I just tell the truth about them, and they THINK it's hell." Nor am I condescending. I mean, no more than you are. (I remember you now. You once also presumed to criticize me in a condescending way because you thought I didn't know anything about lesbians.) When people openly discuss the merits and the deficiencies of various psychiatric theories, it does not make psychiatry "inaccessible" to anyone, or "increase the shame" of anyone. It simply makes people better informed. I think the typical mental health professional does indeed "throw their hats in one direction." (Though I must admit I haven't heard that metaphor before. I'm trying to picture a person doing that.) The reason that pills have largely replaced the talking cure is not because of any concern for "best practices," but because pills are cheaper. Which is better for the racketeers who run the psychiatric industry and who profit from it. As for "mental health funding," there isn't enough money in the entire galaxy to provide the talking cure for everyone who might like it. (I see from your profile that you're a Trump hater. So you probably like the idea of a gigantic welfare state, and aren't concerned about who will pay for it.) No therapist I ever went to ever recognized that I was the expert in my situation. As Szasz famously said: "Psychiatry is the only business in which the customer is always wrong." Sure "meds work." They "work" in exactly the same way that a double martini works. But people who drink martinis don't make the claim that they are doing so to "correct a martini imbalance." Unless they are joking. Knitting and crossword puzzles helped me a lot. Actually, with me it was Martin Gardner puzzles. But that kind of activity was certainly not "destructive." Psychiatric professionals are very much "the authorities." Don't ever doubt that. They are filthy rich, socially very influential, and have enormous and extraordinary judicial and police power over the lives of ordinary people. Practically everyone in the world says they do what they do to be "helpful." That doesn't make it so. If you were to take the gargantuan amounts of money out of the psychiatric industry, how many of those "helping" professionals would stick around because of their altruism, and how many would find something more lucrative to do? If the "narrative" that psychiatrists are "pill pushers working for the man" is a true narrative, then we should say so, whether the narrative is "harmful" to the pill pushers or not. You say you personally have "checked your ego at the door."... OK. It doesn't matter how "palatable" something is if it is not true. But in this case, I did not object to the citations from that click-bait website. In fact, I pointed out that the citations support my argument. But as I've already said, believe what you want to. Best wishes. |
|