LordofPain56
|
4 years ago •
May 6, 2020
4 years ago •
May 6, 2020
There are types who are totally dependent, helpless and have little or no initiative to make any decisions for themselves, and that's okay by me (although I haven't personally known any), I never needed a girl to cook clean, sew, do laundry, run errands, pitch-in financially, as I have always done all those things myself (and from what I have seen, I may have the cleanest, most well-organized house on the block). So, I always thought that a dependent type would be happy here, and I could teach her things, make her life more interesting and build up her confidence. It would be fun.
Then there's the types who claim to be independent, but cannot manage their own lives, mess up their employment one way or another and make excuses for their failures. I have known a few of these and have given advice and/or showed them how to be successful in their endeavors, but they did not seem to have the capacity to learn. Fine, you gotta have some understanding. I can deal.
I haven't personally known a girl with a good head on her shoulders, is conscientious and has the drive to be successful in her interests. I always thought she would fit in here well also, except that I feared that someone like her might feel that they could contribute more (taking away some of the responsibilities I have always been doing), and therefore would begin to feel dissatisfied with the division of responsibilities (even though they are specifically stated in the "covenant"). But you know, sometimes people can gloss over that initially. However, if that did become a problem for her, she could always just open her mouth and speak. And I would be willing to revise what we had previously agreed upon.
I can't see many problems arising in a relationship if both Dom and sub are following the "covenant". Everything is in there. Everything has been thought out in advance.
To me, it's more about the persons personality, capacity to love, sense of morality, willingness to learn and selflessness than it is about how she's bent in the dependency/independency department.
|