howdoIsub wrote:
From my experience. There is no recognition of doing something really well, and if you do something wrong its stored for a later argument.
i don't know if i understand what you are saying, so my response may be presumptuous?
It reads to me like your are describing the vying for position that seems to happen in all relationships? i don't necessarily mean pecking order by "position." i think one of the primary reasons we look for and get into relationship is for 'love'. Then we often seem to make "love" into something fuzzy, ethereal and hard to nail down. Love seems centrally important to me, a need that binds us all together, so i've tried to get more of a handle on what it is. i do think love has a mysterious, feeling side to it, but i also think it has a practical, understandable side. i have tried to break it down, simplify it for my brain to try and make it a more doable discipline ("discipline" is only a partial descriptor for me, but i needed to put a word there besides "thing," that doesn't sound very intelligent lol).
A working definition of "love" for me is the practice of looking and listening, seeing and hearing, then acknowledging and affirming the value of what i see and hear. The definition makes love more functional for me, which is not to say "easy." i think we are conditioned to treat love like a state we have achieved. We have phrases like "falling in love," as though love is a mud puddle or something we stumble into. And i do think love has that angle to it, but i think we more often fall into chemistry, not love. i think having (even some) chemistry with a person makes it easier to choose and practice love with them. i see a lot of D/s as a search for and discovery of chemistry. "Me Dom, you sub, opposites that attract and bond." Of course, it's never that easy because we are complex creatures with a lot of elements and the trick seems to be finding enough 'chemistry' to where we don't separate when we are resting on the shelf, that we don't have to be continuously shaken up to blend.
Sorry, i had to build a little bit of structure to house this.
my read of "there is no recognition of doing something really well," is that there is no love being practiced at that moment.
my read of "doing something wrong is stored for a later argument" is immaturity and/or a lack of love in the relationship.
i don't think love comes naturally, i think we can choose to do it, or not, given probably hundreds of opportunities a day (and i would refer back to the simple definition from earlier for my own functionality). Given the earlier (albeit incomplete) definition of love, i see "argument" as a sort of pleading for love? Each is vying to be "seen, heard, acknowledged and affirmed as having value."