Rosybeth wrote:
I just want to know what goes through one's mind when one reads that someone is a Christian and is also into BDSM. I ask because I explicitly state in my profile that I love the Lord and that I would only want a biblical relationship, yet I encounter fella after fella sending me totally inappropriate messages and images. I am well aware that this is bound to happen once in a while, but it occurs so much that it has me scratching my head a little.
Is it that other people on this site who claim to be Christian have no issue with swearing and talking about/having sex outside of marriage? Is it that I am not taken seriously? Is it a lack of understanding/concern? I will be updating my profile to make it clear that I am more conservative with regard to the aforementioned topics, but I am curious and would like to get some thoughts on this.
"What goes through [this] ones mind" is essentially the same as what goes through my mind with anyone: i.e., i am speaking with an individual, not a standardized, universal belief system. To me, the core messages of Jesus is/was love. It's instructive to me that Jesus' followers were prostitutes and "sinners." The prim and proper religious people of Jesus' time would ridicule and take a superior attitude pointing out that Jesus kept company with "sinners." They used that to try and marginalize Jesus. To me, Jesus didn't show tolerance, let alone favor, for religious folk.
Jesus response to the religious of his age was less than flattering and not accepting. He did not have a live and let live attitude, rather he referred to the religious of his age with terms like "whited sepulchers, vipers brew, hypocrites, etc.."
my read is one of Jesus main complaints with the religious culture of his age was who they endeavored to follow a law carved on stone vs the law of love written on the heart. Rules, regulations, standards vs love. To me, Jesus core message of love requires one to look, listen, see and hear, not the label, but the person.
i recently dated a guy who identified as "Christian," and was very fond of fundamentalist preachers. When i asked him how he reconciled their condemnation of him being gay, he told me it was irrelevant. While i did not agree with or follow his beliefs, they did not preclude me having a relationship with him. As it turned out, the opposite was not true. And i sort of get that. To him, his Christianity was not a belief, it was an identity. i identify as "total bottom" and will not try and have a romantic tangle with another bottom. To me, that is a question, not of superiority, but a matter of being "unequally yoked."