Sololoquy wrote:
I guess our situations are quite different then. I feel that my sexuality is mine to share or not with another person, but it isn't dependent on them. The sexual sensations that please me may be brought out by another person or by myself, logistics notwithstanding. Choosing not to be in a relationship (and I don't want casual sex either) would mean never being sexual again if I didn't do so myself. I imagine that our priorities will be different and that a relationship would be of more importance to you than it is to me. And that's all good - not a judgement.
Personally, I feel fundamentally dichotomous. I rarely find binary options I don't end up straddling. I often see both sides without feeling like I belong to either. My natural state always seems to be mediator, always between.
I get what you mean about being disingenous/fake, but I'm the opposite. To claim I'm a dom or a sub or heterosexual or homosexual or a man or a woman or intense and serious or immature and whimsical: any of these would be disingenous. I'm a switch, bisexual, agender and absurdly serious 🤔 or seriously absurd 😅 I don't know... I like balance and feel that that's really me. Yin and yang, masculine and feminine... I want to be in touch with the interplay of both, not choose a side.
So, being solo for me means self-mastery, exploring different sides, and integrating them into a whole that is neither one thing nor the other, but just is.
I do appreciate your perspective and there are elements I think we have in common, so thank you for sharing. Food for thought 🤔
And vive le difference, eh? "To thine own self be true...." That's opposite of disingenuous. i subscribe to the spectrum theory of sexuality. You seem somewhere fluidly in the middle where i tend to hang consistently at one end. Go figure?
i too feel my sexuality is mine to share or not share with another. i'm not sure i'd could use the word "dependent?" Maybe in a sense. E.g., i can penetrate myself, but i don't want to because things i crave most from sex is are missing, the drive, desire of another person to penetrate me. i don't have that. i don't have the drive, desire to penetrate. And that's just one of many examples.
i can create my own sexual sensations that, in part, please me physically, but that alone leaves out other parts i value more. For me, sex is largely a conduit for deeply connecting with each other. i can, and do, masturbate, but there's always an element of disappointment for me. It's a compromise for me in several ways. For instance, it relieves physical sexual tension. But, the sexual tension that i have when i don't masturbate feeds into my overall desire to be available to receive a Mans desire/need, and that ends up being more important to me as part of sex than the physical sensations alone.
my being 'available' it's not altruistic.
Nor would i want to have sex with a Man who's just doing it because i wanted or needed it. Mutual desire/need from opposite sides is the ultimate goal for me, a symbiotic connection. To me, "relationship" can happen in the moment, it is not necessarily an ongoing commitment. A nod to astrology there, i'm a Libra and i want balance.
To me, being solo, self mastered, independent are all pre-requisite to being in relationship. i do not see relationship ideally as two halves making a whole, but two wholes making something different, more.