Hypnosubmaker wrote:
You should mate and stop trying to be a cunt for someone making a mistake in terminology. Its not clever.
But typical of those with no actual argument.
Like I said it was being hyperbolic to make a point.
But I am going to leave this here. Done discussing the issue
Addressed the point and stay on topic instead of name calling or derailing the convo buy trying to nitpicking minutia already addressed.
To sum up what I was trying to get at tho is that this ....
"Women only need men for sperm or not at all"
Neither this ( which is basically the same level of disrespect)
"Men only need women for a womb or as a sex object"
Is acceptable or ok as a narrative to perpetuate in my view.
Oh, I'm "trying to be a cunt" because you don't know what a bolt strangler is, and I find it funny a/f that you still don't.(I gave you a clue in my first post and it flew right by you.) And I'm the one name calling?
Now your story is you know what you were talking about and were just being "hyperbolic"? Oh, okay.
Oh, I'm derailing the convo by nitpicking minutia? No, I just thought it was hilarious you picked a job that's not a job to be "hyperbolic". And what? You can't have two conversations?
Now what you're getting at has something to do with respect when you started on this road to ruin by saying women make no contribution to the creation , nor the maintenance, of the infrastructure civilization depends upon. Mishka mopped the floor with you when she explained how it was women who provide the underpinnings, the math and science, for infrastructure that exists today and you showed no respect for her argument. It was a woman who figured out the formula for putting a planetary object into orbit. It was a woman who figured out mrna vaccines, and it was a woman who built the Brooklyn Bridge. That all holds no water for you, I know.
It's not that women couldn't design and build the infrastructure we have now. They just weren't allowed to. Men who's masculinity still feels threatened by a woman who can strangle a bolt still discourage women's participation in the creation and maintenance of infrastructure. Throughout history when women created and contributed, men took the credit.
You say this is about respect and somehow don't see how disrespectful you are when you say if there were no men, women would have no infrastructure.
When I read that, I thought about my first day working on a fishing boat in Alaska. We were anchored in a line of boats waiting to make our set. I look out at another boat and there's this female captain who's just finished her set. She had taken off her rain gear and was sunning on the top wheel house deck. She was a beautiful woman who could probably have anything she wanted. If you know anything about fishing boats, you'd know a captain has to be a master mechanic, master navigator, master businessman and crew master. This woman was a boss who commanded respect because she was more capable than the 3 men who crewed her boat. I doubt seriously you'd cut the mustard working for her, and I'd love to hear you tell her how helpless women would be without men. She'd be so fucking amused.
You have no point. You're just trolling for all the attention you can get, and being "hyperbolic" to get it. You're a metrosexual posing to be something other. You said a poster was "simping" because he expressed his admiration of womankind. Is that what I'm doing now? Or am I white knighting? And what would that have to do with this "debate" you accuse me of derailing?
"Hyperbolic"? That's what makes this whole "debate" moot. You'll never concede a point. You'll say "I never said" this and "I never said" that because you really don't know what you're saying or what you want because in the end, it's just attention and respect.
You're getting a lot of attention.
You feeling any respect?