bearfortwinkz wrote:
So what you guys are talking about is what I would call a common sense override. Stuff like that off course use your common sense, especially emergencies. And for that reason, I would agree 100% all the time simply isn’t practical or even possible..
Yeah...there are some serious people here, which i really appreciate. "Role play" repels me (not judging role play, just stating the effect on me) because it feels unreal to me, like i or the person i am with is acting. For me, D/s is all about connecting with another at our deepest, most essential levels, so anything that 'feels' like pretending is a violation for me.
i think it can be easy to get caught up in ideas and the definitions and rules we apply to D/s and, consequently, miss what is really there. i think this applies to TPE as well as the many other elements that can make for a D/s (and it's myriad variations) relationship.
i believe it's important to be cognizant of ones reasons behind entering into a TPE dynamic in the first place?
This is not a perfect analogy, but TPE could be thought of as one of many vehicles that can take 'us' (a D and s?) to a place. The specific instance, like what to wear, or when to pee, chastity, etc., could be likened to the fuel for the vehicle. Each 'instance' is personal, specific, custom to that D/s dynamic. Chastity might be a full tank of fuel in a dynamic where what to wear may be like a gallon of fuel, so each may take a different distance and refueling times for different destinations vary.
Sorry to indulge in cliche, but is it about the journey, not the destination?