Literate Lycan(dom male) |
2 years ago •
Sep 9, 2022
2 years ago •
Sep 9, 2022
Literate Lycan(dom male) • Sep 9, 2022
I've seen this pop up before in other conversations. Typically from the other side of the slash. A submissive asking what is the appropriate manner to address someone and immediately a host of well-intended but draconian responses. Perhaps we can all agree that any popinjay "demanding" a title upon first salvo of messages is ridiculous, but really it literally depends upon the people interacting and how comfortable they feel as they are getting to know one another. If some individual demands a title or honorific on day one, that might be a great indicator that the individual isn't the right fit . . . or maybe the perfect fit. Each to their own.
I'm not a titles individual. Names and nicknames established within a dynamic work, but that is any relationship. Regularly I am called "sir" by literally everyone because of who I am - not because of anything in the lifestyle. So although "Sir" and "Ma'am" are accepted as terms of reference in relationships, they are also acceptable terms of respect used in society. I see absolutely nothing wrong with anyone using them in common discussion or when interacting with a new person. Yes - they have additional connotations within the lifestyle when dynamics form and that is beautiful. And maybe terms such as Master, Maestro, or whatever are earned - but how they are earned is literally dependent upon those using them. When a relationship develops and the dynamic formulates, then the meaning of the words evolve into something much more. I have other Dominants refer to me as sir and I in return in polite conversation but that in no way implies any sort of hierarchy so much as equal footing and polite interaction. I do agree wholeheartedly that when first interacting with a new individual, it is very acceptable to simply refer to them by name (or nick name) until both individuals organically reach a point where terms, titles and such may evolve. |
|