MissBonnie wrote:
IMO anything thing can work if you BOTH want it to and BOTH are willing to put int he efforts needed
but saying the above, if you already know and understand what you need and want, why even try? If you've been there, done that before, learn from it. Needs, wants and desires....most aspects you require should match (within reason) or at * least*counter balance the other parties.
edited to add "least"
^^This.^^
i think the importance of compatibility is often overlooked, and outright misunderstood, in relationship in general, and more specifically, in the BDSM community. There is this notion that a 'Dom" is supposed to be all knowing, all powerful, etc., etc., and that the 'sub' is less than and can only learn and obey. One of the things that attracted me to this site is the number of D/s couples who go beyond those notions.
As MissBonnie notes, i agree that "BOTH" wanting and "BOTH" willing is key (i.e., 'compatibility'). i would even take it a step further as i think the best bonds are formed between people of compatible needs (beyond desire). To me it is a sign of immaturity when a persons needs makes them needy though. i think when a person is needy, they do not fulfill their part of the "BOTH...willing to put in the efforts needed."
It seems to me that what often happens in D/s, and a pitfall to try and avoid is substituting 'role play' for real (and again, i qualify "to me," this is just how i see it). i literally despise "role play" because to me it is like saying what we feel, need-who we are, is 'play,' just an act. And i get that some use role play as a means to get to the real, that is different. Some stay there and never go beyond, and that to me would be denial of who we are.
i think this particularly happens when "most aspects you require [don't] match."