Online now
Online now

blah, blah, blog

Thanks to Ingénue{Círdan} there is a recent spate of blogs in THE CAGE, written by males... mostly "Dom males." my first thought is they are not so much suddenly sold on the idea of blogging as they can't resist their instinctual (natural?) urge to rise... to a challenge? Time may tell.

i get to proudly declare that with >360 forum entries (many lengthy), i'm not among the non-writers in the cage, but this is my first blog. Apparently to some, it's 'different for girls'? Pause for musical interjection: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nNzzK1dUtCI

As a gay sub i have often wondered if my love of, and propensity for, writing has something to do with my wiring? Is it because i'm gay and it's a result or expression of my feminine side? But then, that stereotype unravels for me because it turns out i am just as frustrated as many women are with their straight guys, by all the gay guys who don't 'blog' (read: "open up and talk about their thoughts and feelings").

Ever that analyst, i have come up with all sorts of reasons for that.

1. Blame the patriarchy. Lol, no really. Cliche aside, i think there is some truth to putting at least partial blame on engrained (patriarchal) cultural conditioning that has trained boys from birth that they are different when it comes to stuff like having feelings and expressing thought and feeling. An irony is how much of that conditioning comes from women (mothers, aunts, teachers) who have internalized patriarchy also conditioned in. i am convinced that a lot of internalized patriarchal influence still flies under the radar, even in a more enlightened era.

2. Biology? Neuropsychiatrist and writer Louann Brizendine has authored two books that look at our biological/brain wiring: "The Female Brain" and "The Male Brain." On page six of her book "The Female Brain" she notes: "Under a microscope or an fMRI, the differences between male and female brains are revealed ot be complex and widespread. It the brain enters for language and hearing, for example, women have 11 percent more neurons than men. The principal hub fo both emotion and memory formation-the hippocampus-is also larger in the female brain, as is the brain circuitry for language and observing emotions in others. This means that women are, on average, better at expressing emotions and remembering details of emotional events. Men, by contrast, have two and a half times the brain space devoted to sexual drive as well as larger brain centers for action and aggression." Note: as a scientist, i think Dr Brizendine may overreach a bit with her conclusions, but i think she raises points for further query? She also promises to write a book on "The Gay Brain," which is also different in its physiology.

3. Given the prior two points, i think most men may be handicapped ( both by nature and nurture) when it comes to emotional communication? Which is not to say guys cannot do it. Check out the percentage of authors and screen writers who are men? Which is not to excuse the crime of sexism that has limited female contributions, but to note that it is entirely possible for men to learn how to know and express things like emotion. It may take work, but i think men can learn how to communicate things like emotion, their inner self, even if it doesn't come as naturally to do so.

i was an avid reader as kid. i sensed i was different from most boys and learned how to hide very early on (five or six years old retrospectively). It took till i was about 14 to bury myself for survival. i grew up in a conservative religious household, just to add to the fun and help bury more parts of me. But even as a kid i can remember how frustrated i'd become with my dad, trying to get him to open up and share himself. We didn't do a lot of talking or sharing in our family, so books became my best friends.

Later on in life, i realized that i had developed people reading skills in order to satisfy my need for communication and connection in a family that did not use words. One thing i learned was how a side effect to being in an environment where words were used minimally to communicate was the notion and expectation that others were people readers too. Turns out that people reading can greatly enhance/supplement communication, but on its own (without words), is horribly inadequate. As an aside, i wonder how many guys are stuck in a place where they assume (unconsciously) that people/mind reading is an adequate thing? That people know more about them than they have actually revealed?

i began learning how to communicate when i married. Initially i would get very frustrated with my wife, assuming she knew how i thought or felt about a thing, even though i had not adequately communicated. i'd actually get angry with her, assuming she was toying with me. The funny thing is, i quickly surpassed her when it came to communication her once i realized i had to use words.

Turned out i was less afraid of being open and vulnerable, and the tables turned. With me it was ignorance that kept me from communicating, with her it was fearful hiding. So, a word of warning to the self protective out there looking for communicating mates, be careful what you ask for.
4 years ago. November 18, 2020 at 12:06 AM

Was having a great conversation/exchange today on a blog written by FeistyMinx on one of those oft awkward topics (for some). A thought occurred to me while reading and conversing that "insta domming" or its flip side "insta subbing" can happen even in a well established, ltr.  That may be a 'well duh' for some, but it was a "oh, hey,  yeah" moment for me. 

i'm of the opinion that compatibility of kinks if vital to the health and sustainability of BDSM relationship. i don't think compatibility commonly gets a lot of positioning or consideration when exploring entering into a ltr or intimate, ongoing relationship. i'm convinced it is something practical we can consider before 'moving in together' (so to speak), that can safe a lot of grief later on. 

We do not necessarily enter a relationship aware of all of our kinks. Also, new wrinkles in our needs/desires, can not only be discovered along the way, but also newly acquired. From that came my "oh, hey, yeah" moment.  i wonder how often in an established relationship, that a new kink gets presented, and because of a well established pattern of D/s, the expectation on one side of the slash or the other, is for instant submission?  

my guess is, prolly not too often in mature relationships, because just their continued existence is likely evidence of ongoing trust and communication. But i know there can be a complex push/pull between kinks (which those who know me know that is define kinds as "personal sexual needs/desires). i know a lot of time, submission can be not just through one kink, but through a skillful creation of the Top/Dom connecting the dots of several kinks in His/Her sub to create a different, maybe more complex, submission.  It is in those machinations where i think the hazard exists for insta dom/sub. Where there is a history of submission in certain areas, but the addition of a new kink, even though connected to established kinks, makes it new territory for both the Dom and sub.  So the presumption or expectation of immediate submission may fail on some level, if not completely, 

Sasa​(dom female) - Person first, kinks second... I need to know them, but I still learn that a very few people are able to tell what they want, also those you say they are experienced. Could I have new kinks, sure... could I live without something I like a lot... I don't know.
4 years ago
tallslenderguy​(other male) - Yes, exactly. That is where the balancing act comes in. A new kink that a person likes a lot and does not live without has the potential for a new connecting point or ending the relationship. i think the potential has a greater likelihood for acceptance (implementation? too clinical?) if it isn't pursued presumptuously or "instantly."
4 years ago
Sasa​(dom female) - Comment deleted by poster.
4 years ago
Sasa​(dom female) - Acceptance includes that some things can't be given or taken. If you are in love with a sadist it is possible he could give what he needs to give to someone else. If a kink is something tiny of course you could leave it behind. There is a difference between needing and wanting. A partner is not an extra who has to fulfill inner movies, but people have to talk about them. That is the most difficult part. Not that one gets what he want or not. On top - isn't it also up to the dom what is on the table and when ;-)
4 years ago
Jack in the box - I discovered a new kink during a lengthy relationship (years later) - I would like to give "credit" to being driven there.
Not sure if it was a kink that was always there and I just never knew - or my partner created it in me.
I think with the advent of sites like these, alot of people will put their "standard" kinks on the table, but reserve ones they may feel shame for - idk, just speculating.

Thank you for posting 👍
4 years ago
tallslenderguy​(other male) - IDK Jack, i think whether a kink already exists or is new can be mysterious. i have a kink for drinking pee from a Top/Doms cock for instance, and it is a new kink for me. It was 'created' by connecting other kinks that were already there, and fairly deep for me: i.e., the desire to please/pleasure my Top, the desire for im to use me to fulfill His lust/need, the desire for affectionate degradation/humilation and enjoyment of my Top, the desire to be inseminated/impregnated by my Top. Connect all those together, and i can be 'trained' to not only drink pee from my Tops cock, i can see me getting to a place where it feels like a need, sort of an addiction, that i could see my Top working me to a place where i'd beg for it. But it would take a knowledgeable, understanding Top/Dom to get me there. He'd have to help me overcome my fear and axiety over failure first. But it is a 'new kink" birthed and created, put together using the parts of my other kinks.
4 years ago
Jack in the box -
Makes perfect sense - thank you for sharing 👍
Gives me a new perspective on my own
4 years ago
OraclePollon​(sub female){NotYours} - I think conditioning is very powerful, and not in a bad way. I am all for positive conditioning. Lines are so grey when you trust someone or want more. And in some cases... boredom (which I would consider negative conditioning) are all things that just sneak up on you and become part of your routine. I have a whole little box of my "kinks" that would only come out to play for the right person, but they don't even exist in some cases with the person I am with. That is compatibility. I don't need it all, just need to use the right pieces. That would be like saying my life is incomplete because I will never own a penthouse. It is something I want to do, but it is not going to affect my life with the right person.
4 years ago

You must be registered and signed in to comment


Register Sign in