Online now
RegisterSign in
Online now

blah, blah, blog

Thanks to Ingénue{Círdan} there is a recent spate of blogs in THE CAGE, written by males... mostly "Dom males." my first thought is they are not so much suddenly sold on the idea of blogging as they can't resist their instinctual (natural?) urge to rise... to a challenge? Time may tell.

i get to proudly declare that with >360 forum entries (many lengthy), i'm not among the non-writers in the cage, but this is my first blog. Apparently to some, it's 'different for girls'? Pause for musical interjection: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nNzzK1dUtCI

As a gay sub i have often wondered if my love of, and propensity for, writing has something to do with my wiring? Is it because i'm gay and it's a result or expression of my feminine side? But then, that stereotype unravels for me because it turns out i am just as frustrated as many women are with their straight guys, by all the gay guys who don't 'blog' (read: "open up and talk about their thoughts and feelings").

Ever that analyst, i have come up with all sorts of reasons for that.

1. Blame the patriarchy. Lol, no really. Cliche aside, i think there is some truth to putting at least partial blame on engrained (patriarchal) cultural conditioning that has trained boys from birth that they are different when it comes to stuff like having feelings and expressing thought and feeling. An irony is how much of that conditioning comes from women (mothers, aunts, teachers) who have internalized patriarchy also conditioned in. i am convinced that a lot of internalized patriarchal influence still flies under the radar, even in a more enlightened era.

2. Biology? Neuropsychiatrist and writer Louann Brizendine has authored two books that look at our biological/brain wiring: "The Female Brain" and "The Male Brain." On page six of her book "The Female Brain" she notes: "Under a microscope or an fMRI, the differences between male and female brains are revealed ot be complex and widespread. It the brain enters for language and hearing, for example, women have 11 percent more neurons than men. The principal hub fo both emotion and memory formation-the hippocampus-is also larger in the female brain, as is the brain circuitry for language and observing emotions in others. This means that women are, on average, better at expressing emotions and remembering details of emotional events. Men, by contrast, have two and a half times the brain space devoted to sexual drive as well as larger brain centers for action and aggression." Note: as a scientist, i think Dr Brizendine may overreach a bit with her conclusions, but i think she raises points for further query? She also promises to write a book on "The Gay Brain," which is also different in its physiology.

3. Given the prior two points, i think most men may be handicapped ( both by nature and nurture) when it comes to emotional communication? Which is not to say guys cannot do it. Check out the percentage of authors and screen writers who are men? Which is not to excuse the crime of sexism that has limited female contributions, but to note that it is entirely possible for men to learn how to know and express things like emotion. It may take work, but i think men can learn how to communicate things like emotion, their inner self, even if it doesn't come as naturally to do so.

i was an avid reader as kid. i sensed i was different from most boys and learned how to hide very early on (five or six years old retrospectively). It took till i was about 14 to bury myself for survival. i grew up in a conservative religious household, just to add to the fun and help bury more parts of me. But even as a kid i can remember how frustrated i'd become with my dad, trying to get him to open up and share himself. We didn't do a lot of talking or sharing in our family, so books became my best friends.

Later on in life, i realized that i had developed people reading skills in order to satisfy my need for communication and connection in a family that did not use words. One thing i learned was how a side effect to being in an environment where words were used minimally to communicate was the notion and expectation that others were people readers too. Turns out that people reading can greatly enhance/supplement communication, but on its own (without words), is horribly inadequate. As an aside, i wonder how many guys are stuck in a place where they assume (unconsciously) that people/mind reading is an adequate thing? That people know more about them than they have actually revealed?

i began learning how to communicate when i married. Initially i would get very frustrated with my wife, assuming she knew how i thought or felt about a thing, even though i had not adequately communicated. i'd actually get angry with her, assuming she was toying with me. The funny thing is, i quickly surpassed her when it came to communication her once i realized i had to use words.

Turned out i was less afraid of being open and vulnerable, and the tables turned. With me it was ignorance that kept me from communicating, with her it was fearful hiding. So, a word of warning to the self protective out there looking for communicating mates, be careful what you ask for.
5 years ago. Friday, November 20, 2020 at 1:10 PM

i notice two approaches when it comes to pleasing ones partner, thinking primarily sexual stuff here.  It seems more pronounced in D/s dynamic, but it may only seem "more pronounced" because we talk about sexual stuff more in D/s culture? idk

i self identify as "total bottom."  Some of that may be compensatory, idk. i spent half my life as a gay guy married and serving as a top to a sub bottom woman. i was trapped in a religious prison i finally escaped (not implying all religion is a prison, mine was though).

While i was still trying to be straight, i still wanted (needed) to be 'topped.'  my former wife made a few attempts, but she was so obviously not into it that i didn't want her to even try. i topped her all the time, and was good at giving her multiple orgasms, but over time she became aware of her own dissatisfaction.  Even though i was good at giving her orgasms, it was not enough. 

What was missing was mutual desire.  She wasn't wired to top, and neither am i.  It seems to me that "desire," those sexual needs we call "kinks," is a part of who we are, not something we just choose?  i tried most of my life to be something different from who i am. Not only did it not work, it almost destroyed me. i could feel my unacknowledged and un-affirmed self becoming invisible.

i don't think this is unique, i think a lot of us experience this. i believe there is a social construct, a cultural conditioning that shames and controls us into trying to give our intimate partners what they want/need in the name of 'love.'  i get this. i love/loved my former wife and desperately tried for 31 years to give her what she wanted/needed. But i could not, despite my sincere attempts. Most of that time i spent accusing myself of being broken and blaming myself every which way, over and over, continuously. She affirmed my self loathing, which made it harder. i don't think she was purposely mean or evil, it was our response to the rules and norms of our cultural conditioning. Not whining here, just trying to state the facts of how it was. 

What brings all of this to the surface today is i am doing some online fantasy on another site with a Bi guy. Despite my explaining my being a "total bottom," he seems intent on trying to get me to 'do' things that are 'top' to me. He wants to 'pleasure' me by touching my penis, and he wants me to pleasure him using my mouth/tongue on his anus. Some may laugh at my issue, as this is all online fantasy stuff. i hate role play, who and how i am is real for me, i do not consider anything i do sexually to be a "role" that i "play."  Which is not to criticize those who do, it just isn't me. Which i guess is the crux of this blog entry. i've tried discussing this with him, but he just does not seem to get it. He seems to be of the mind set that He is doing stuff i want, so i should be doing things he wants. The difference is, i would never ask, or want, him to do something that he doesn't want/need to do. I.e., i want all of my connections to be born out of mutual desire.  

Personally, i would rather go without than have a partner do something just because i want, or even need, it. For me (and i get the impression i am not alone in this) my desire/need is connected to my partners. i am continually beating the drum for compatibility because i do not think it is sustainable to give something that we do not have. To me, that is like imitation food. It may satisfy taste buds, but has no nutritional value. 

One of the things that complicates this is my sub nature. i cannot count the number of times i have done something for a Top/Dom because they tapped into my sub nature, but not my sub needs/desires.  my impression is that happens a lot in the D/s world, particularly in less mature or more casual connections? 

 

This blog post has received comments, register or sign in to read and add comments.

Register Sign in