Online now
Online now

blah, blah, blog

Thanks to Ingénue{Círdan} there is a recent spate of blogs in THE CAGE, written by males... mostly "Dom males." my first thought is they are not so much suddenly sold on the idea of blogging as they can't resist their instinctual (natural?) urge to rise... to a challenge? Time may tell.

i get to proudly declare that with >360 forum entries (many lengthy), i'm not among the non-writers in the cage, but this is my first blog. Apparently to some, it's 'different for girls'? Pause for musical interjection: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nNzzK1dUtCI

As a gay sub i have often wondered if my love of, and propensity for, writing has something to do with my wiring? Is it because i'm gay and it's a result or expression of my feminine side? But then, that stereotype unravels for me because it turns out i am just as frustrated as many women are with their straight guys, by all the gay guys who don't 'blog' (read: "open up and talk about their thoughts and feelings").

Ever that analyst, i have come up with all sorts of reasons for that.

1. Blame the patriarchy. Lol, no really. Cliche aside, i think there is some truth to putting at least partial blame on engrained (patriarchal) cultural conditioning that has trained boys from birth that they are different when it comes to stuff like having feelings and expressing thought and feeling. An irony is how much of that conditioning comes from women (mothers, aunts, teachers) who have internalized patriarchy also conditioned in. i am convinced that a lot of internalized patriarchal influence still flies under the radar, even in a more enlightened era.

2. Biology? Neuropsychiatrist and writer Louann Brizendine has authored two books that look at our biological/brain wiring: "The Female Brain" and "The Male Brain." On page six of her book "The Female Brain" she notes: "Under a microscope or an fMRI, the differences between male and female brains are revealed ot be complex and widespread. It the brain enters for language and hearing, for example, women have 11 percent more neurons than men. The principal hub fo both emotion and memory formation-the hippocampus-is also larger in the female brain, as is the brain circuitry for language and observing emotions in others. This means that women are, on average, better at expressing emotions and remembering details of emotional events. Men, by contrast, have two and a half times the brain space devoted to sexual drive as well as larger brain centers for action and aggression." Note: as a scientist, i think Dr Brizendine may overreach a bit with her conclusions, but i think she raises points for further query? She also promises to write a book on "The Gay Brain," which is also different in its physiology.

3. Given the prior two points, i think most men may be handicapped ( both by nature and nurture) when it comes to emotional communication? Which is not to say guys cannot do it. Check out the percentage of authors and screen writers who are men? Which is not to excuse the crime of sexism that has limited female contributions, but to note that it is entirely possible for men to learn how to know and express things like emotion. It may take work, but i think men can learn how to communicate things like emotion, their inner self, even if it doesn't come as naturally to do so.

i was an avid reader as kid. i sensed i was different from most boys and learned how to hide very early on (five or six years old retrospectively). It took till i was about 14 to bury myself for survival. i grew up in a conservative religious household, just to add to the fun and help bury more parts of me. But even as a kid i can remember how frustrated i'd become with my dad, trying to get him to open up and share himself. We didn't do a lot of talking or sharing in our family, so books became my best friends.

Later on in life, i realized that i had developed people reading skills in order to satisfy my need for communication and connection in a family that did not use words. One thing i learned was how a side effect to being in an environment where words were used minimally to communicate was the notion and expectation that others were people readers too. Turns out that people reading can greatly enhance/supplement communication, but on its own (without words), is horribly inadequate. As an aside, i wonder how many guys are stuck in a place where they assume (unconsciously) that people/mind reading is an adequate thing? That people know more about them than they have actually revealed?

i began learning how to communicate when i married. Initially i would get very frustrated with my wife, assuming she knew how i thought or felt about a thing, even though i had not adequately communicated. i'd actually get angry with her, assuming she was toying with me. The funny thing is, i quickly surpassed her when it came to communication her once i realized i had to use words.

Turned out i was less afraid of being open and vulnerable, and the tables turned. With me it was ignorance that kept me from communicating, with her it was fearful hiding. So, a word of warning to the self protective out there looking for communicating mates, be careful what you ask for.
2 years ago. December 12, 2021 at 6:51 PM

i recently spent time with a guy, we are exploring a possible exclusive 'boy friend' relationship. We have a certain good chemistry along with some potentially volatile issues as well, it feels a little star crossed to me. Anyway, that is not the point of this entry. 

i self define as "total bottom with some sub."  i qualify that because my sub side is pretty particular and only responds to particular type of "Soft Dom."  i don't really see myself as "slave" or "masochist" or the plethora of other descriptors in the BDSM community. IOW, i think like most who are serious about this on either side of the slash, ""it" needs discussion."  

We spent four days together and i think each of us learned some valuable stuff about the other. Prior to our get together, He gave me a list of things to buy and/or bring for our get together.  He was matter of fact and pretty specific with the list and about what He wanted.  i realize that this is probably a pretty common thing in a lot of D/s relationships, but it was a first for me. It took me several hours and lots of running around to get everything on the list, even thought it was short, and i was surprised to find myself enjoying it.  

As i have considered it, i understand that my enjoyment came from a feeling of connection with Him.  i know this may be a "well duh" for some reading this, but it was a new one for me. i actually felt a little child like with the specificity of instruction, as though nothing was left to chance, and was surprised at a sort of sense of security i felt. 

While we were together, He continually gave me driving instructions while driving, or would explain in detail about how best to do or choose a thing. At one point i just gave in from trying ot assert or do on my own and purposed to just let Him take charge. Then when driving He made a quick, sideways comment: "do i have to do everything?"  

That made me wonder if his assertion of control was purposeful domming or just a part of a controlling personality?  i wanted to discuss it, but did not feel the opening or opportunity yet. But it has me thinking how common this seems to be in D/s. 

It makes sense to me that part of a Dom persons nature is the desire/need to be in control and take charge, and my brain and feelings were going that way till the "do i have to do everything" comment. To me, that pointed to not so much a desire to be in charge, but a concern that if he didn't take charge and control, things would not happen as he wants/needs. 

i know this is an oversimplification, generalization, but i can see two general forms of control in a D/s dynamic. 

One is the conscious taking charge and control of a sub with known and purposeful intent, the other looks to me like a controlling personality that seeks control, not with understanding and purposeful intent of D/s dynamic. The latter seems out of an unconscious (or disguised?) insecurity that fears not being in control or egotistically assumes their mate cannot do __________ without  their input. 

 

Fyglia Wicked​(dom female) - Control is not in my vernacular as a Domme.. I lead therefore I have responsibilities not a power trip to hide behind..
2 years ago
Jack in the box -
Seems a touch rude in my opinion , what he said, and how he said it
2 years ago
A Cloud​(sub female){Owned} - Sounds manipulative to me. Leading someone to dependence and then undermining it at the same time. You are right to be wary.
2 years ago
tallslenderguy​(other male) - i'm not so much wary as aware. i do not think it's simple or a lot of behavior is always conscious. i don't think it's all one way or another, that maybe there is overlap too. We all have insecurities and different coping mechanisms, and we never stop needing to grow or arrive. i think this guy is growing and really a cool and sincere person, i do not believe he would purposely try to manipulate me. But i do know that a granted position of control that a Dom may have or assume can also become a place where insecurity may become hidden.
2 years ago
Bella duPuy​(sub female){Not lookin} - No - this is not an oversimplification, at all.
i view it as hitting the nail on the head.
When things like that happen, i immediately put on the brakes an address it. Experience tells me that if they are, indeed, of a controlling nature, then They will likely ensure 'the window to address or discuss' that event will remain latched tightly.
Your inner spirit/Holy Spirit/Conscience will tell you something is off kilter.
Listen to Him/It. 💗
Better to apologize later, than have to call an ambulance because you dismissed a 🚩
Be well. Be safe, darlin.
2 years ago

You must be registered and signed in to comment


Register Sign in