LordofPain56
|
6 years ago •
Dec 17, 2017
6 years ago •
Dec 17, 2017
Speaking from the viewpoint of traditional, "head-of-household" or "taken-in-hand" type relationship (which had been the norm for thousands of years, at least up until about 100 yrs ago), the basics would be:
1) The man, Dominant or Master is the protector of his girl. He keeps her from physical, mental and spiritual harm (even if that means restricting some of her freedoms to prevent her from accidentally or unknowingly harm herself). Obviously the Master himself must not cause her physical, mental and spiritual harm, thus he must be intelligent, self-disciplined, attentive, understanding and compassionate among other things.
2) The Man, etc is financially responsible for her (and himself) combined as a unit. He must make certain that she has food, clothing & shelter at the very least. In todays world where both partners might each have an income, this requirement is not negated. The Man is still responsible and may need to oversee her expenditures. Typically in these types of relationships, it is understood that major financial decisions are discussed between them with the man having final authority to engage or decline a significant expenditure or loan.
3) The man acts as her guide and teacher in all matters (physical, mental and spiritual). The submissive should look up to her man, follow his knowledge and teachings and use his actions and his life as an example for her to follow, obey him at the least and adopt his attitudes toward religious & political beliefs at the very most. Nowadays, your militant liberal feminist crowd would highly disagree with this. Physically, the Master teaches her what he likes domestically/sexually, allows her time to adapt to his desires. As she gains experience, he may gradually increase intensity of playtime activities after giving her a safe-word to use.
4) On the matter of personal freedoms, this varies by couples. I don't like the idea of picking and choosing her personal friends, but if she has one who is a bad influence, or in some way dangerous, I warn her about it up to a certain point and allow her to decide if she should end the friendship. I believe that the Master should allow her outings with friends and girls night out as long as they don't get into trouble. If they do, it is Masters responsibility to curb her activities without his presence. I think we've already discussed financial freedoms.
5) The man is responsible for his girl's health. This can be in light form or taken to extremes. Master may impose diet and exercise routines, but if so, he too should participate (after all, he is supposed to be the good example, right?). In my viewpoint, health also falls under the protection category. I personally do not go in for extreme sports like hang-gliding, bungee-jumping, para-sailing or anything like that, but then, I wouldn't hook up with an adrenaline junkie in the first place (unless she happened to be a masochist who craves a brutal whipping with long stingy multi-tail floggers) Haha.
|