dollMaker(dom male)
|
2 years ago •
Sep 13, 2022
2 years ago •
Sep 13, 2022
Firstly these types of Contracts, whatever the flavour, words used, are not, in any way shape or form legal documents. I see them as a visual representation of the discussion, agreement and consent given by two or more parties to each other. Its a setting out of responsibilities to each other, top to bottom, bottom to top and should I feel also include any rules and proportional punishments if such are broken.
I also feel strongly that these should not be cast in stone never to be changed or reviewed things. Its a good idea to also build into the agreement that the contract will be revisited and altered, amended on a regular basis. Dynamics and relationships over time, can and do evolve. Things wanted and not wanted can change. I have myself included limits etc as part of a contract, but not as fixed points but things that can be changed. I think again this gives a framework and its in black and white as to what the parties are agreeing to. Building in the times for review also a good idea, say after a month, 3 months, 6 and then regularly afterwards. Some will even build a duration of contract, with revisiting and renewing part of the dynamic.
I think if you see it as a framework of agreement, not rigid but adjustable, they are healthy useful things, but they should never be totemic, rigid or ever thought as being legal or binding. If things are not working out, and after renegotiation, failure to reach consensus occurs, then no matter what, no one should try and hold a contract over the other as something they have to adhere to if consent is no longer enthusiastically given for the basis of the dynamic that was built on the contract that has now ended.
There are contract templates available online, but I strongly feel these should be customised to suit the needs of the persons involved. Both parties should have an active part in creating the basis for what they are going to do.
|