Quote: And if they are still in love then how come he hasn’t left his wife for her?
Ever seen someone cry so hard they have cry snot coming out of their nose? Basically, that's why.
It doesn't have to be a choice. Loving one person (or whatever comes close to affection at least) does NOT mean you have to ditch who you're already with. Are you implying he "should" leave her? That you believe it would magically make things "easier"? or "less painful"?
To leave one person or the other would be to put one as "superior" and the other "inferior". Even if you're all pushing each other away you still know each other. Why you're hurting each other. Why you're distant. Why you suffer. Or heal. "Not being around" is often "Not wanting to see the pain". Not having the balls to face it to be frank. Think about it. Only when people SEE the harm they caused do they often tend to work things out properly.
People get confused and think "cuckholding" has to be the answer. Behind backs. This is secrets, deception. Which risks leading to lies. But if it's not "that person" it's probably going to be something else where something is "temporally taking your partners attention from you". There is an "attraction" but people lose sight of the whole "But it's behind backs" part. Is it really "behind backs" that's the kink, or is it knowing you can be with someone else as well while still being loyal to who you're already with? I seriously don't think people doing the whole cuckholding thing give that enough thought. Dunno if cuckholding specifically factors in here, but I do wonder about it in general. There are times people aren't getting attention/intimacy from their current partner and so seek it out in others. That is a factor of course. But by no means the only situation where others are sought out. Or perhaps not even sought out at all and simply "happened to get closer" through interactions. One is more healthy then the other.
Simply let your partner know if you're attracted to someone else. Or are you afraid they'll turn their back on you and ditch you if you're honest with them? But if that happens they're not there through hard times anyway. Be honest right away and you can figure out how to work them in WITH you from the START. Otherwise it causes complications down the line. As proven in this thread. There's still the whole "time/effort" thing to balance out, but when it's "blind" it's like a bull stumbling into a china shop. If one/both of you don't know then you risk stretching yourselves too thin. Not knowing how to manage the "where and when". The "time". You can still be in a "none relationship" and have to worry about that. But eh, safe labels. Boil it down to what it really is. Caring about two people for whatever reason and figuring out how to keep everyone involved happy. Which only honesty is going to establish. A situation has to at least be "known enough". Which it is here at this point. I just wonder if it's DISCUSSED enough. Communication.
The reason people don't be honest about that kind of thing with their partner, whom they claim to love, is fear. A fear of being "left" or that their partner might feel "replaced" (mistrust/irrational fear. etc). Which are topics I get into ASAP right away regardless of current relationship/none relationship stance. Most people simply have that fear consume them and fall into silence. SUFFER in silence. Or otherwise make assumptions about how things can't work out but then have to say otherwise after being challenged/asked enough. It's so EXPECTED to just be with one person. But rarely is it STATED. So even though the situation might be a bit of a mess I strongly suspect it was never "disallowed". Even if it was people can discover "new feelings" thinking they knew better beforehand when they really didn't. But that doesn't mean you're being "replaced". Why should that person leave who they're already with just because they care about someone else too? To "replace" them? Because it's assumed "the other person matters more" when that is likely not the case?
I don't want to say "poly" because that's a misnomer. It's more like Batman saving both Robin and the girl when joker sends them both falling to their doom. eg: He cares for BOTH of them on the same "max level". Same concept likely applies here. I've pulled a Batman at times too. Others have as well. May as well imply we should just leave too. Fuck no. No one gets ditched or replaced. Everyone gets the attention and affection. The complication of course is that there can be times people have concerns and don't LET you do that. eg: They're being negative even when you try to focus on having a good time. Which is getting rather into it. But long story short, "Worry less, enjoy the time you spend together more." I mean if it's not "other person" then it's going to be "X flaw here". Or some other concern. But in the end you either wallow in despair or you choose to have a good time together. Which fits a variety of situations. For context I was in a situation where I was talking to someone myself. Lot of past pain and such. Things will have to be discussed at some point. But in that moment I CHOSE to be more playful and flirty. And they did too. Despite my current feelings at the time causing me to think of the negatives. Because I chose to pursue having a good time they rolled with it. We enjoyed ourselves. And things are working out. The past pain involves them having been "closed" previously. Which made it impossible for us to enjoy doing things together (seriously, why should OUR interactions of which affects happiness be decided by OTHERS? And without my input at that). We became distant for a while. But now it's like "Let's focus on the good times". This is of course with their partner knowing they're open now.
Consider how "limiting interactions with others" decides FOR them. Very often without even having discussed anything with those people (because chances are you was assuming things would "just be fine"). I think that bothers me the most. This is what lack of communication does.