DeviousMaster(dom male) |
4 years ago •
May 12, 2020
to be or not to be
4 years ago •
May 12, 2020
DeviousMaster(dom male) • May 12, 2020
NCarraway wrote: ...._Wow, i love this explanation, that Dominance is born out of submission. _
I disagree with this ... its fluffy nonsense ... its the sort of claptrap that inexperienced D-types tout to inexperienced s-types to make themselves sound sage-like and wise. Am I Dominant only in your presence? Do I stop becoming dominant when you leave the room. How will you become attracted to me if I do not display dominant traits? Am I only dominant to the one who submits to me? If I am the Dominant and you leave me, does that mean I am no longer a Dominant? The truth is that all of us exhibit a range of traits, some of those are dominant, some of those are submissive, some are neither. Some of those traits are core characteristics and do not change rapidly in response to external factors (stress, people we are around, scenario). Can you change these core characteristics over time? If you are determined to unpick programming and to put yourself in uncomfortable mind-sets, absolutely. The things that make me dominant, or to apply the label from this lifestyle ... A Dominant, are these core characteristics. These core characteristics are inside me, they do not depend on anyone else. I take ownership of them and I have the agency to change them. Dominance is not born out of submission[/quote] Well, I also disagree with what you have wrote. It's not fluffy nonsense as it has a lot of sense actually,(if you put vanity aside), it's just a matter of acceptance.Domination is born out of submission and submission is born out of Domination, simple as that, same as you can't hear without the help of the ears, same as you can't see without eyes. I do not consider Myself an inexperienced D-type nor that I'm insincere trying from My entire heart to gain some applause in this life, what you have called being a clap trap. I do also consider Myself being a sage-like and wise but only because I went through a lot of suffering and different experiences in this life, from which I've learned enough to understand at least what the word peaceful really means, and because some guys like Alan Watts or Sri Ramana Maharsi had some interesting thoughts, none of these to tout to inexperienced s-types. Yet, I am more than sure that there is much more to be learned. In terms of the subject of the thread, I guess it was obvious that I was referring to the term Domination between a sub and a Dom, as in a relationship, and not domination at work. Yes, you are a dominant only in her/his presence otherwise you'll pour hot wax on your microwave, you'll do some bondage to the Tv or you'll force orgasm the fridge. Yes, you do stop becoming Dominant after she/he lefts the room otherwise you'll dominate items with no feelings. You will display dominant traits after she/he will open the gates, until then, 'you'll stay in the rain with or without an umbrella', unless you're straight violent which shows rape and weakness or unless the gates are already open and you're just lucky that she/he has submissive traits, with not so many filters involved, but only a huge craving, no matter what. Yes, you are only Dominant to the ones who submits to you, otherwise, see the rape example. If you are the Dominant the she/he will leave you, you'll still remain a Dominant, but a lonely one in search for a submissive, unless fridge, tv, microwave are cool for some fun. In My opinion, the word dominance can relate only involved in a relationship between a Dominant and a sub, outside of it is totally useless, it creates chaos, wars, stress, vanity, anger, hatred, fear, etc, basically all the negative bull shit.And history can tell this, even the so beautiful NOW. Dominance is born out of submission, submission is born out of Dominance. |
|