Byrdie(switch female){rl only}
|
3 years ago •
Jan 9, 2021
3 years ago •
Jan 9, 2021
US-citizen and former International Ms Leather title holder Mollena Williams-Haas once spent some time in, I believe, Sweden for a kink parade and visited some kink shops, like one does. Mollena identifies as a slave, and was startled to notice that the packaging for the kink toys universally showed men as being the bottoms / submissives and women being the tops / dominants. When she asked around about why there was no gender-reversal for the packaging, she was met with appalled reactions: a _woman_ getting beaten as part of advertising?!?
I'm not saying that there are no dominant or top men in Sweden (or wherever this happened), but it was most certainly not a given that men would be the dominant force in a power exchange.
It's a different perception that leaks into everything. Women in the U.S. go into a kink shop and look at rope: who is tied up on the packaging? Women. Bondage cuffs? Women. Who is holding a dildo? Women. Unless one is going into Mr. S. or a similarly male-oriented kink shop, the majority of images showing bottoms or submissives are going to show women. Sex sells, and in the U.S. sex for advertising usually means sexily-clad women.
Women inexperienced with kink, who don't know what role(s) they want to take, walk in and see that over and over ... the subtle message is that women are the bottoms and submissives. Nevermind the books! There are books for tops and dominants, usually with dark covers, sometimes showing very muscled forearms leading to hands holding rope or an implement, or a flat jeans back pocket with a hanky coming out the back; and then there are way fewer books for "dommes".
Kink can be gear-heavy and men are more known for being gear-heads than women.
Nevermind walking into a kink party or class, or even a forum, and having your role assumed based purely on gender. That's exactly what happened to me within a minute of me signing on. I swear: there were guys on here watching the "new member" listings like hawks, and they sent me come-ons while I was still filling out the basic forms. One went silent, and the other replied with "Hello ... 'domme'."
Oddly, someone in my local kink community decided to challenge my adjusted role ... but did it as a coward: online, using a pseudonym, so I didn't know who it was who had a problem with me realizing that I just wasn't cut out to be a submissive. Then there were the people who treated me like a resource: "Thank god, we need more Black dommes." He realized that he'd used his outside voice, whipped his head to look at me, saw my side eye expression, and immediately apologized. I was no longer Byrdie to him, I was Black Domme Resource #14, and now I knew it.
I've been accused of hating men because I enjoy CBT, but quieted that noise real quick when I asked, "But why would I want to touch the junk of someone I hate? EEEEWWWWW!" (Yeah, I totes don't get "hate fucking." If I hate someone, I'm not thinking about them *that* way - for that is the stuff of nightmares, right there.)
There's enough pushback - both direct and indirect, both personal and systematic - to being a dominant woman in kink that someone who is just starting to find her feet (keeping in mind whatever other personal struggles she may have) might categorize themselves as "switch" (a valid choice if one enjoys a variety of roles, certainly) initially before earning some experience and possibly changing roles - or never doing so. I've certainly seen switches who own slaves, and have seen posts by people who would never submit to a switch, so ... maybe there are more dommes out there than are being counted.
|