Closetedfreak |
3 years ago •
Sep 6, 2021
3 years ago •
Sep 6, 2021
Closetedfreak • Sep 6, 2021
For the sake of simplicity, and length of post, I'm going to stick with the hetro relationships.
From a purely subjective standpoint it is clear Dominant Females is a smaller group than sub females, dominant males, and especially sub males. We could debate whether this last category is truly comprised of submissive mem, or just men who want to manipulate women into emulating some porn they've seen. Similarly, I've found , the "Dominant Female" category has a fair number of women who I wouldn't consider truly dominant. They are either pro's looking for a market niche, or just women in the dating world who have discovered it's a way to attract men who otherwise would not have been interested in them. The trendy phrase lately is "identify as", so I'll stick with that for the sake of this post. From the personals section of this site, purely numerical, not an opinion: Dominant Females - 6 pages Submissive females - 45 pages Dominant males - 84 pages Submissive males - 77 pages From a logical standpoint, if I chose to be a Dominant male it not only means I'm supposed to get what I want a higher percentage of the time, but I have 45 pages of females to look for a good match. If I'm cursed with these submissive desires, I am setting myself up for the frustration of being subjected to things I might not want and I have 6 pages of females to try for. Again establishing that my desires are not logical. Conversely, and to the point of the thread, why would ONLY 6 pages of women choose something that stacks the deck in their favor so heavily? DF's have 77 pages of men to choose from and, theoretically, DF's get what they want in the relationship. Over 7 times the number of women choose to identify as submissive, making their search harder and setting themselves up for less personal gratification in calling the shots. If they are Dominant, their search for men just got easier and they may end up getting endless footrubs and housecleaning, or however they choose to use their position. To explain this, the talk always turns to "society" and the way we are raised, which is probably true to a large extent, but I think it misses the biggest point. It's antiquated, and not PC, to speak of gender roles as innate, but I think there is an innate sexual desire for females to find the alpha male. Especially when you are younger. I always knew the quickest way to chase off a girl was to appear too submissive. As women age I think this innate lustful desire is pushed aside by pragmatism, so some women realize "hey getting what I want isn't such a bad idea". Anyway all this TLDR is to say don't underestimate our innate desires, and women are hard wired from birth to be sexually attracted to strong, self assured, leaders, which does not often translate to the submissive men category. I know there are Dommes dying to tell me about their alpha male, corporate senior VP, submissive, but no matter how you slice it, and man on his hands and knees kissing your feet just doesn't ring that alpha male buzzer inside many women's innate desires. |
|