DaddyDrago(dom male){LilAmethys}
|
4 years ago •
May 10, 2020
4 years ago •
May 10, 2020
The age old question, "What is a dominant?" comes to mind.
How do we define dominance?
Is it has been suggested as being shown as bullies?
Is it only present when a submissive kneels and says, "You are my dominant. I choose to align myself with your journey" ?
Is it when a person says, "I am dominant"?
I am of the school of thought that dominance is born of character traits that culminate into an individual that can responsibly manage their life and therefore has the evidenced proof of being capable of being responsible for aiding another's life.
I would dare say no one is born with that.
Which child is born with compassion? Or, patience? Or, kindness? Or, stability? Or, consistency?
Aren't all of these, and several more, markers of healthy dominance?
Oh, there are those who may innately be more inclined to have the characteristics to be more honest, have more integrity, have trustworthiness as a matter of birth. Those would be awfully difficult to find and see within life (as often life experiences then may tear down and erode such natural gifts or conversely bolster) and there is no saying that same individual would still choose to be dominant and not submissive.
That leads to the existential question......................were we destined to be as we are? Could we be anything but given our journey's and how they looked?
I would say yes and no.
We are who we are as evidenced by us being ourselves. Destined to be so though? Where is free will choice in that design?
SO, to answer the OP's question, No I don't believe we can be born dominant. Being dominant is a set of characteristics that are culminated through life's experiences. Yes, many come to dominance and couldn't imagine being anything else given the set of circumstances with which they lived through their experience in life (I would consider myself in this space). There are just as much truth to another personality walking the same road traveled as me and ending up submissive in nature.
I believe it comes down to innate choice. What we each FEEL we must be to be true to our deepest nature. Maybe that was created before time even began. Maybe we were always destined to be who we are. The truth is we can't know that reality today with any empirical facts. The best we can say is we are dominant or submissive respectively because we believe we need to be to be our truest self.
As to the theology..............in almost any religion I have ever witnessed 'God' is a spirit. 4th dimensional. Beyond space and time. Our finite minds wrapping around an infinite concept is more than lost on us...........let alone putting that 'God' in a box neatly packaged as male or female. Why can't they be both? Or, none of the above? Why do we feel the need to bring 'God' down to our level so we can understand? If we understand where is faith? Some things aren't meant to be understood, just believed.
To your point though, I would agree that dominance and submission is a 50/50 existence. A reciprocal power exchange. Both must have power to be able to exchange it.
I would disagree that you can't be dominant without a submissive. Or submissive without a dominant. We are who we are regardless. HOW that is manifest, the permission we are given within the context of a dynamic changes the depth with which we are allowed to show who we are, I accept that.
However, those things that are considered dominance responsible, trustworthy, integrity, confidence, stable, compassionate, patient all of those traits require no dynamic to be present in order to walk in and live within as a dominant figure.
Conversely, some of those same traits and various others allow submissives to walk within their submission in everyday life without the precursor of a dynamic. Kindness, helpfulness, consideration, servitude, compassion (and several more) are all everyday characteristics of submission that needs no approval to exist.
I do, conversely, agree with blueeyesgirl............we may be dominant in nature that doesn't make us dominant to anyONE without permission in the sense of dominating in an individual's life. Consent is still a necessary component before we are considered dominant in anyone person's life.
|