CreationPro- Where the Sexual & Spiritual Meet

Susie Q{Daddy Ant} - Interesting viewpoint

BunnyBites​(sub female){HoK} - I am glad you are fast to safeguard and protect your child. I find it disgusting that stuff like this happens. To me it seems like grooming. It is nice to know you are monitoring your child, because not many parents care to do so anymore.

ControlYourHole​(dom male) - Thanks BunnyBites- yes it is VERY important to guard what influences your children today…if people want to post ageplay stuff on mainstream social media I wouldn’t care as long as it’s age restricted and clearly labeled as such…but now all these innocent vanilla parents are gonna let their daughters unknowingly learn to talk in a way that turns on lots of men on- both Daddy Doms who have legal age little subs and unfortunately, potentially guys with serious issues who want young girls to have an inappropriate interest in that kind of thing.

Then the parents, once they realize, will think “oh anybody who’s into this must be a predator”☠️Ever heard of a Hegelian dialectic? It’s pitting 2 bad options against each other to push people toward a 3rd “choice” that combines both. So here, option A is “ageplay & DD/lg are inherently sick and wrong” and option B is “kids can be exposed to fetish role play and that’s fine”. So then the synthesis creates reality C- where ethical adult DD/lg is demonized by society MEANWHILE children are still openly fed sexual thoughts & behaviors by the public manipulation of the subculture. I’ll stop ranting but the sociological & spiritual implications of sex, morality and media are something I’ve studied for years in case you can’t tell😂🤓

Max Heathen​(other male) - Curious here because I play YT content for my gran'imps.... I did a search for the video but nothing came up that wasn't proper content but that doesn't mean much seeing as location matters when it comes to searches. So all I can do at this point is ask a few questions....
If you didn't watch the video, are you sure it was adult content and not a little doing proper educational content? IMO, I wouldn't want a person dressed in sexy clothing and doing UWU voicing to be teaching children's content, yet if they are dressed like a child, talking like a child, surrounded by children's items it can be considered an effective way to reach a childs understanding/learning response. To me, adult or child, there is nothing wrong with using the imagination and playing dress up if they wish.
With that said, IF the person was talking/teaching or dressing in a manner of kink, pushing kink for the advancement of kink, that shit should be reported so the content gets flagged for the algorithm. I agree that sexualizing children is a vial part of humanity and my method of dealing with such things is considered inhumane and cruel.
Who subscribes and who likes is unknown without research and YT is world wide. 12.3mil is a lot of people until you consider how many people there are in the world and how many parents there are that can easily make that number, just as it could be those of a perverse nature... or even a mix of both. Just for example: Ms Rachel (a child educator on YT) has a following of 25 Million. She nearly fits the description of what you present above, from a reading perspective.
I'll reiterate... I couldn't find the content of which you are talking about and my expression here is to question and consider an alternate view. Are you sure you saw what you feel you saw, or did your involvement in the Kink World, automatically trigger the content as Kink because you are already exposed to a different nature of dress up and kink play? As BunnyBites said, I'm glad you are actively aware and involved with the safeguarding of content to your children and being proactive with a quick response imo is the correct action. Private research and investigation for correct judgment of social responsibly should follow next, yes?

ControlYourHole​(dom male) - Great points to consider MH and FP- sayings can have very different meanings in different regions & spaces online too…growing up in the southern US the term “little one” is used for babies all the time but I’ve just never heard “little” by itself to refer to kids. Like you don’t hear “oh did you take your little to the park today? It was so nice”😂Only in DD/lg do I see little used to describe someone so that influenced my perception for sure. I don’t mean to assume the creator of that vid has bad intentions but rather it’s how YT algorithms behave that concerns me.

Another channel that kids videos led into I saw had a girl in a very revealing bikini (basically everything but nipples exposed up top) suggestively dancing around a huge toy toilet with a bunch of kids toys in the room👀that one especially reminds me of the infamous Balenciaga ads with little girls holding bondage toys in a way.

I guess the main takeaways I have from all this are the following-
- I’m todays online world, even “childrens sections” of mainstream social media aren’t to be trusted without direct supervision. For more reasons than just sexual stuff of course (violence, propaganda etc).
- corporations/big tech seem to be exploiting certain bdsm concepts to get attention, but why does it tend to be in a way where it is bound to seem creepy or worse to outsiders? Is that part of a much larger problem in america of big money bringing out the darkest sides of people, particularly relating to sex? Obviously the answer is yes to some degree but it takes time to see the bigger picture.I’m just glad there are communities like this where people can see the healthy and constructive side of different kinks, and not be left to porn and SM commercialization and creep-ification of it👍

Max Heathen​(other male) - To all the above points... Agreed and it's very worrisome to think about. Those without restraint for sexualizing children will use any method deemed acceptable to push for the slow perversion and acceptance to child manipulation.
A thought that plagued me during the past election campaign was: Since when was it acceptable for our VP to brag about being involved in Kink? As she publicly brags about being a "Brat". It doesn't matter what form of "Brat" she is, could you imagen the backlash if any other politician declaring publicly they are a DD, Master, Sadist or Sub? The lack of understanding from the Vanilla world concerning Kink terminology, can make something look innocent when in fact it declares something deeper, both bad and good.
I'll add here something I forgot to mention in my above post: I enjoyed reading your blog and understand from your POV in the moment, how alarming that must have been. Thank you for starting the discussion, as I feel too many times people are oblivious to the desensitization going on in mainstream media as well as on-line platforms.

fluffypoppet​(sub female){Protected} - Max, your comment about a VP being brat made me giggle. Gen-Z took brat and gave it a new definition.
"Brat (noun): An icon; an embrace of authenticity and confidence in oneself."

This isn't kink... although, I'd be interested to see someone with BDSM ethics and values leading the country. An emphasis on consent could do us all good.

Also relevant... I used to work with kids, and when coming up with a name for a new kid's program, someone proposed the name "Little STEAMers." Around that time the word "steamer" was trending because of the Cleveland Steamer. I had to explain to my boss that we might not want to call the kids little turds especially since their parents were undoubtedly internet savvy.

Language changes and flows... I'm kind of nerdy about enjoying it.

Anyway, I've enjoyed this post and glad you shared. :)

Max Heathen​(other male) - The more you know ;)

fluffypoppet​(sub female){Protected} - This topic stuck with me overnight, and my little rock tumbler brain has been polishing some thoughts on it.

Like Max said, a lot of content for kids is manufactured by adults using things they think will appeal to kids. Ms Rachel is an iconic example.

Also, people use the term "littles" to refer to kids... in our culture it has a specific, often sexualized meaning, but to much of the world it may just means a kid.

From the perspective of someone adding content to YouTube, there are a couple places the creator has to choose whether or not to push the content to kids or a mature audience. So, the creator definitely made a CHOICE to push their content to kids.

But, another question occurred to me... are littles all sexually provocative? I think even in the lifestyle, there are littles who regress without any element of sexuality to it. Some littles are into being sexy.

Of course, I always support parents making choices about what their kids are exposed to. You did the right thing for you and your family 100%.

I just wish I could see the video too... but then, I'm kind of a let's all reads banned books girl.