AKittenforSir(sub female){JohnBond}
|
5 years ago •
Oct 28, 2019
5 years ago •
Oct 28, 2019
Some amount of rules is important but how many and how you categorize them is up to the parties involved.
For example, I am expected to call my Sir “Sir”. But is this a rule or just an agreement? You could say it’s a rule because he told me to call him Sir, I always do, and if I didn’t he would be upset and there would probably be repercussions of some kind. But you could also argue that it isnt a rule because he never specifically said it was a “rule” nor has he said what the punishment would be, if any, if I failed to call him Sir.
So basically what I’m saying is that any D/s M/s relationship needs agreements and parameters (for example agreeing on titles, power exchange, limits, etc) but whether you consider these to be “rules” is up to you.
To be clear, some rules are undeniably rules. Doms may verbally give clear cut and dry rules or even give you a written list. That can be helpful is some cases but isn’t necessary for every dynamic.
I’ve had very clear cut rules with former Doms and found them to be helpful, maybe even necessary for those arrangements. But the majority of my Sir’s “rules” tend to be more like agreements and understandings between us rather than all black and white. We’ve found that our personal relationship thrives when I can be authentic and that authenticity gets stifled when I’m bogged down with too many rules. We both know and understand that if he wants something he only needs to ask and if he doesn’t like a behavior he only needs to say so and I will correct it. “Rules” aren’t necessarily required.
|