Preface ~ This is likely to be an unpopular opinion *especially because I do identify as a submissive* and that's truly okay. There is a lot of varying opinions on everything in this lifestyle and it doesn't mean any of us are right or wrong. There is a lot of gray area, and this is only my perspective. I'm not trying to piss you off but tomorrow I may try haha. 🙃
The current trend I am repeatedly seeing is how many people are focused on what a gift submission is. I just dont comprehend it in this way. I guess my brain works differently. But if we see submission as a "gift," then why don't we see dominance as a "gift", too? I don't like the "gift" analogy. It just seems wrong to me. Why are we even keeping track of if someone has "earned" us? Maybe we haven't "earned" them? Should we keep a tally? /sarcasm.
This concept just bothers me. Im not sure calling submission -a gift- is appropriate. A gift is defined in the dictionary as a thing willingly given to someone without payment. But in bdsm context, we do expect payment. We expect our partner to hold up their end of our negotiations and be dominant. We expect them to take control, to know whats best for us.and to take care of all our needs. That's a pretty huge payment, isn't it. If a Dom does not give you time, effort, attention, orgasms, security etc then you are unlikely to keep submitting to him. Why would you? Noone blindly gifts submission without expectations and a return of the investment.
We could say that dominance needs to be earned, too. Just like submission. Why is there a differentiation? Neither side should have more importance, in my opinion. Both are essential. Reciprocity. Neither dominance nor submission can happen successfully without the other. That's why it's an exchange. Which absolutely makes sense. Give & take. Push & pull. Cooperation & compromise.
Discussion is encouraged after my bubble bath 👀.