tallslenderguy(other male)
|
2 years ago •
Nov 1, 2022
2 years ago •
Nov 1, 2022
i think this is a great topic of discussion, i have some thoughts to toss into the mix.
i grew up in an era and culture that was unaccepting of gay people. i grew up when the standard idea was that being gay was sick and sinful, by heteronormative standards and religious standards (respectively). Of course, my ideas and options for relationship were affected by my conditioning. my reality was/is that i am attracted to men, but what 'should be' was very different.
i could go into detail, but the point i make now is the expectations i was conditioned to have about relationship did not aline with the reality of who and how i am. Processing through that web taught (sorta forced really) me to look, identify and question the status quo.
i think a lot of unhappiness derives from failed expectations, expectations that were not built on a foundations of reality in the first place, and destined to crumble accordingly. How many childhood stories of romance/relationship end with "and they lived happily ever after"? Who has not been exposed to that conditioned expectation?
Humans are a combination of feeling/emotion and rational thought, and in my experience, feeling/emotion usually wins out when it comes to what guides and directs our actions. We may rationalize our feelings because we've been conditioned to believe reason is superiour to feeling, but i think our feeling are often steering our decisions.
For instance: "falling in love." We base so much on that feeling, but how many have a reasoned out explanation of what love is? Just the phrase: "falling in love" makes it seem like something random, like we slipped and fell into a mud puddle, or off a cliff lol. Of course, our emotions are postive about it, so maybe it's more like falling into a puddle of chocolate pudding? Either way, love (as a basis for relationship) is often treated as some random event that happens to us vs a rational choice. A random event that we place a huge amount of expectation for happiness on.
Part of my religious conditioning, both growing up and as an adult, bandied the term "love" about. A lot. It was foundational to the belief system i grew up in, and i think a lot of ideas/expectations from religion have been woven into social culture in general. It's hard to know which came first, sort of a chicken/egg question.
While i left the absolutist approach that i was raised with (for me, it did not jive with reality), i did believe there were some gems worth keeping, but they translate differently than they did in the culture i was raised in, when applied to the reality of who and how i am.
For me, the basis of relationship, and especially 'romantic' relationship needs two foundational components: love and compatibility. i do not see that either of those things gets much rational attention, that most of that is guided by how we feel. i believe our feelings can benefit and be supported by some rational structure.
i think we need to learn how to identify our needs, and subsequent wants, and to be able to articulate to our self ('self knowledge') and potential significant others ('communication') what those are. As i see it, that is how we can establish compatibility. Of course, it's not that simple or easy, because life is fluid. Some needs/wants stay fairly stable and constant, others mutate, so what starts out as compatible, may not sustain as such. So, is the expectation of the happiness we derived from the symbiosis of compatibility realistic? i don't think there is a black or white answer to that question.
i also think that we can benefit by including a practical side to "love." To me, love does have a sort of mysterious side to it, but i also think it has a side that can be seen, understood and practiced as a principle. To that end, i've tried to come up with a love framework for my own life as a guiding principle. Mostly, i see the principle of love as a sort of graciousness we can adopt and practice in relationship. To me, love foundationally acknowledges our imperfection, both in seeing and acting. So, we mess up. because "....we know and see in part." If two people in relationship truly grasp that as the human condition, it makes it more natural to forgive, because what we are often needing to forgive to help preserve cohesion, is our natural propensity to fail.
i measure a persons maturity (and thus qualification for relationship in general) by their understanding and dedication to the principle of love. i think the need for love is a thread that binds all of humanity together.
i think where a lot of relationships fail because of not enough happiness is because of incompatibility and lack of, or imbalance of love (i.e., both people are not similarly mature in their understanding, dedication and practice of the principles of love).
|