Online now
Online now

blah, blah, blog

Thanks to Ingénue{Círdan} there is a recent spate of blogs in THE CAGE, written by males... mostly "Dom males." my first thought is they are not so much suddenly sold on the idea of blogging as they can't resist their instinctual (natural?) urge to rise... to a challenge? Time may tell.

i get to proudly declare that with >360 forum entries (many lengthy), i'm not among the non-writers in the cage, but this is my first blog. Apparently to some, it's 'different for girls'? Pause for musical interjection: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nNzzK1dUtCI

As a gay sub i have often wondered if my love of, and propensity for, writing has something to do with my wiring? Is it because i'm gay and it's a result or expression of my feminine side? But then, that stereotype unravels for me because it turns out i am just as frustrated as many women are with their straight guys, by all the gay guys who don't 'blog' (read: "open up and talk about their thoughts and feelings").

Ever that analyst, i have come up with all sorts of reasons for that.

1. Blame the patriarchy. Lol, no really. Cliche aside, i think there is some truth to putting at least partial blame on engrained (patriarchal) cultural conditioning that has trained boys from birth that they are different when it comes to stuff like having feelings and expressing thought and feeling. An irony is how much of that conditioning comes from women (mothers, aunts, teachers) who have internalized patriarchy also conditioned in. i am convinced that a lot of internalized patriarchal influence still flies under the radar, even in a more enlightened era.

2. Biology? Neuropsychiatrist and writer Louann Brizendine has authored two books that look at our biological/brain wiring: "The Female Brain" and "The Male Brain." On page six of her book "The Female Brain" she notes: "Under a microscope or an fMRI, the differences between male and female brains are revealed ot be complex and widespread. It the brain enters for language and hearing, for example, women have 11 percent more neurons than men. The principal hub fo both emotion and memory formation-the hippocampus-is also larger in the female brain, as is the brain circuitry for language and observing emotions in others. This means that women are, on average, better at expressing emotions and remembering details of emotional events. Men, by contrast, have two and a half times the brain space devoted to sexual drive as well as larger brain centers for action and aggression." Note: as a scientist, i think Dr Brizendine may overreach a bit with her conclusions, but i think she raises points for further query? She also promises to write a book on "The Gay Brain," which is also different in its physiology.

3. Given the prior two points, i think most men may be handicapped ( both by nature and nurture) when it comes to emotional communication? Which is not to say guys cannot do it. Check out the percentage of authors and screen writers who are men? Which is not to excuse the crime of sexism that has limited female contributions, but to note that it is entirely possible for men to learn how to know and express things like emotion. It may take work, but i think men can learn how to communicate things like emotion, their inner self, even if it doesn't come as naturally to do so.

i was an avid reader as kid. i sensed i was different from most boys and learned how to hide very early on (five or six years old retrospectively). It took till i was about 14 to bury myself for survival. i grew up in a conservative religious household, just to add to the fun and help bury more parts of me. But even as a kid i can remember how frustrated i'd become with my dad, trying to get him to open up and share himself. We didn't do a lot of talking or sharing in our family, so books became my best friends.

Later on in life, i realized that i had developed people reading skills in order to satisfy my need for communication and connection in a family that did not use words. One thing i learned was how a side effect to being in an environment where words were used minimally to communicate was the notion and expectation that others were people readers too. Turns out that people reading can greatly enhance/supplement communication, but on its own (without words), is horribly inadequate. As an aside, i wonder how many guys are stuck in a place where they assume (unconsciously) that people/mind reading is an adequate thing? That people know more about them than they have actually revealed?

i began learning how to communicate when i married. Initially i would get very frustrated with my wife, assuming she knew how i thought or felt about a thing, even though i had not adequately communicated. i'd actually get angry with her, assuming she was toying with me. The funny thing is, i quickly surpassed her when it came to communication her once i realized i had to use words.

Turned out i was less afraid of being open and vulnerable, and the tables turned. With me it was ignorance that kept me from communicating, with her it was fearful hiding. So, a word of warning to the self protective out there looking for communicating mates, be careful what you ask for.
2 years ago. January 4, 2022 at 11:32 PM

Requisite disclaimer: i only presume to speak for myself, i know we all vary. 

When i was younger i read the Carlos Castaneda books about the sorcerer Don Juan. At one point Carlos was trying to see the spiritual (paraphrasing from memory) and it kept alluding him. When he queried Don Juan as to why, Don Juan explained that the spiritual cannot be seen by directly staring, but can only be seen peripherally. 

i read that 40 years ago, but it stuck with me, i find it applies to a lot, and today i saw it in the context of power exchange. When a Top/Dom/Man is a little unsure of Himself, wanting/needing/asking for control, my wiring, the bottom/sub/? in me opens wide and craves to give Him what He lusts for.  But when He tastes my response of submission, takes it for granted, presumes it, i shut down. Sure, i can play the game, follow the rules and 'submit,' but He has lost me, He just retains the appearance of submission, control.

If He does not presume to fully grasp His power, if He gazes at it peripherally, He retains control and wholly possesses me.   

 

SirsBabyDoll​(sub female){Pizza+☕} - That's pretty much how Brats are with their Dom...make the assumption of submission and you loose it. Appreciate it as the daily gift that is LENT to you, and you retain it.
2 years ago
tallslenderguy​(other male) - i'm not familiar with "Brats" in a D/s context, but the name doesn't feel right to me? idk, to me what i describe is not being what i think of as "bratty?" For me it's not a willful choice to rebel but more of a shutting down. The power is His to open or close me, it doesn't feel willful, like i am making a choice, it's an emotional response one way or the other.
2 years ago
SirsBabyDoll​(sub female){Pizza+☕} - Silly! I was making a comparison. I'm a brat and what you dearibe is close to how I am.
2 years ago
Sasa​(dom female) - doesn't things like that come in waves, a kind of frequence for all of us? Nothing I know is steady... I don't believe we are always in full power and if I would leave a submisse beause of that - is that submissive? I should read the old stuff again, I remember too. Thank you for the reminder
2 years ago
Sasa​(dom female) - and if a submissive would leave me... sorry
2 years ago
tallslenderguy​(other male) - What are you referring to when you say "things like that?" i do not understand your question/point? :-)
2 years ago
Sasa​(dom female) - I misunderstood something. Sorry
2 years ago
tallslenderguy​(other male) - No worries. :-)
2 years ago
slaveMikayla​(sub female){MstrJ } - Thank you for sharing your perspective. Castenada was a fantastic writer. I've taken so many of his concepts to heart over the years; chiefly the concept of a "Path with a Heart" and the "Enemies of Knowledge". Keep on keeping on.
2 years ago

You must be registered and signed in to comment


Register Sign in